瑜伽論記 3.244

3.244

二十四、三苦門中，唯識云：十一少分壞苦所攝，老死位中多無樂受，依樂立壞，故不說之，此中謂非受俱行支其一分者，謂與樂受俱者，是依樂立壞故言一分，十二少分苦苦所攝，一切支中有苦受故，依苦受立苦苦，故言一分。十二全分行苦所攝，諸有漏法皆行苦故，依捨受說，十一少分除老死支，前不苦不樂受俱行唯十，今加非受俱支故言十一一分，如前實義。如是諸聖教中隨彼相增所說不定，緣起經、十地經二文有異，恐繁不述。

Regarding 'Twenty-fourth, among the gateway of the three sufferings,' the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi says: A portion of eleven is subsumed under the suffering of change; in the state of aging-and-death there is mostly no pleasant feeling, and the suffering of change is established on the basis of pleasure; hence it is not mentioned. Here, 'one portion of the branches not co-occurring with feeling' refers to those co-occurring with pleasant feeling; because the suffering of change is established on the basis of pleasure, it says 'one portion.' A portion of twelve is subsumed under the suffering of suffering; because there is unpleasant feeling in all branches, the suffering of suffering is established on the basis of unpleasant feeling; hence it says 'one portion.' The whole of twelve is subsumed under the suffering of conditioning; because all conditioned dharmas with outflows are the suffering of conditioning, it is explained on the basis of neutral feeling. A portion of eleven excludes the aging-and-death branch; previously, those co-occurring with neither-unpleasant-nor-pleasant feeling were only ten, but now, adding the branch not co-occurring with feeling, it says 'one portion of eleven,' like the true meaning above. In this way, across the sacred teachings, statements are not fixed in accordance with the predominance of those characteristics. The two texts of the Pratītyasamutpāda-sūtra and Daśabhūmika-sūtra differ; fearing verbosity, I do not state them.