瑜伽論記 9.166

9.166

次就能所依，若唯有假無有實事；既無所處，假立亦有。是即名為壞諸法者，基云：若有假無實事既無所處假立亦應無等者，若唯言有假說等假依他而無圓成者，圓成是假說依他處，既無依處何處得有假說依他。又假說者，謂所起法是有，而依他圓成實事是無，起遍計時必依二性，而無所依二性而有能依遍計者，即名壞諸法。

Next, based on what relies and what is relied upon: "If there is only the metaphorical and no real thing, since there is no locus, metaphorical establishment would also exist. This is called destroying all phenomena." Ji says: Regarding "If there is the metaphorical but no real thing, since there is no locus, metaphorical establishment should also be absent": if one says there is only the metaphorical paratantra of metaphorical designations, but no pariniṣpanna, then pariniṣpanna is the locus of the metaphorical paratantra; since there is no locus of reliance, where could the metaphorical paratantra exist? Furthermore, "metaphorical designation" means that the phenomena that arise are existent, while the real things of paratantra and pariniṣpanna are non-existent. When parikalpita arises, it must rely on these two natures; if one asserts that without the two natures that are relied upon, the reliant parikalpita exists, that is called destroying all phenomena.