瑜伽師地論略纂 2.94

2.94

「又於四種那落迦中」下，明受樂分三，三界別故。初在此卷，後二在第五。欲界分三：地獄為一，鬼、畜、人為二，天為三。　「四種地獄」者，謂八熱、八寒、近邊、獨一。　「三種餓鬼」者，即前所說三種餓鬼。「無樂受」者，乃至等流樂，亦皆無有。世親《攝論》說有等流樂者，《唯識》第五會云：應知彼依隨轉理說，隨薩婆多等。或彼通說餘雜受處，無異熟樂，名純苦故。此說除地獄，餘鬼、畜生亦有等流樂，無異熟樂，名為純苦。故此文云大力鬼、傍生、人有資具樂。此中無樂，唯言三鬼。〈決擇〉即言：一分傍生亦名純苦者。傍生雖實爾，無別相可標，略而不說。

From "Furthermore, in the four kinds of narakas" downward, the explanation of the experience of pleasure is divided into three, because the three realms differ. The first is in this fascicle, and the latter two are in the fifth fascicle. The desire realm is divided into three: hells make one; ghosts, animals, and humans make two; devas make three. Regarding the "four kinds of hells": these are the eight hot, eight cold, peripheral, and solitary hells. Regarding the "three kinds of hungry ghosts": these are the three kinds of hungry ghosts explained earlier. Regarding "having no pleasant experience": even concordant pleasure (niṣyanda-sukha) does not exist at all. Where Vasubandhu's Mahāyānasaṃgraha states that there is concordant pleasure, the fifth fascicle of the Vijñaptimātratā reconciles it, saying: one should know that it speaks according to provisional doctrine, following the Sarvāstivādins and others. Alternatively, it broadly speaks of other mixed experiences where, because there is no retributive pleasure (vipāka-sukha), it is called purely painful. This means that aside from the hells, other ghosts and animals also have concordant pleasure, and lacking retributive pleasure, it is called purely painful. Therefore, this text states that powerful ghosts, animals, and humans possess the pleasure of material requisites. That there is no pleasure here is said only of the three classes of ghosts. The Viniścayasaṃgrahaṇī then says: "A portion of animals is also called purely painful"; although animals are indeed like this, because there is no distinct characteristic to designate, it is omitted and not mentioned.