瑜伽師地論略纂 4.119

4.119

「問：前已說無明為緣，發起業有」者，善不善業、潤已未潤，皆名為有，能有果故。今依潤已，能近有果，獨得有名；未潤已前，初造離增，名之為行。依義勝異，各得一名。今依通義，故言無明發起業有，即是行也。

Regarding 'Question: It was already stated before that with ignorance as condition, karmic existence is initiated': wholesome and unwholesome karma, whether already moistened or not yet moistened, are all called existence, because they are able to have a fruit. Here, relying on what has been moistened and is proximately able to have a fruit, it alone obtains the name 'existence'; prior to being moistened, when first created without increase, it is called volitional action. Relying on the preeminence and difference of their senses, each receives its own name. Here, relying on the common sense, it is said that ignorance initiates karmic existence, which is none other than volitional action.