成唯識論演祕 7.34

7.34

又依名計義等者。按無性《攝論》第五本云：「一、依名遍計義自性，謂如是名有如是義；二、依義遍計名自性，謂如是義有如是名；三、依名遍計名自性，謂遍計度，未了義名。釋曰：謂了其名，未了彼事，執名為實。故《瑜伽》云：『謂不了色事分別色名。』四、依義遍計義自性，謂遍計度，未了名義；五、依二遍計二自性，謂遍計度此名、此義如是體性。」

Furthermore, regarding pervasively conceptualizing the referent based on the name, and so forth: According to the root text of Asabhāva's Commentary on the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, fascicle five: 'First, pervasively conceptualizing the intrinsic nature of the referent based on the name, that is, such a name has such a referent; second, pervasively conceptualizing the intrinsic nature of the name based on the referent, that is, such a referent has such a name; third, pervasively conceptualizing the intrinsic nature of the name based on the name, that is, pervasively conceptualizing a name whose referent is not understood. Exposition: That is, understanding its name but not understanding that matter, one grasps the name as real. Thus the Yogācārabhūmi states: "Not understanding the matter of form, one discriminates the name of form." Fourth, pervasively conceptualizing the intrinsic nature of the referent based on the referent, that is, pervasively conceptualizing a referent whose name is not understood; fifth, pervasively conceptualizing the two intrinsic natures based on both, that is, pervasively conceptualizing this name and this referent as having such an essential nature.'"