開元釋教錄 10.4.5

10.4.5

部。三誤。象步經即無所希望經異名。二名各存。四誤。菩提無行經即文殊問菩提經異名。存其二本。五誤。以僧佉外
道論入大乘中。六誤。小乘錄中達摩多羅禪經與不淨觀經總是一經。其不淨觀約法為名。達摩多羅就人立
稱。二部俱存。七誤。十誦律六十一卷。十誦律五十九卷。二本不殊。其六十一卷者卑摩羅叉伽毘尼序置之於後。
餘並無異。今云重譯。二本俱存。八誤。律二十二在於律中。明了論在於論錄。一題分二。九誤。其律二十二乃是明了
論之半題。今存律二十二卷。誤中重誤也。眾事分阿毘曇論代錄之中即言宋朝求那跋陀羅共菩提耶舍譯。入藏
之內則言失源。前後差違十誤。餘者在錄。不能繁敘）。
隋眾經目錄五卷（仁壽二年勅請興善寺大德與翻經沙門及學士等撰）
都合二千一百九部五千五十九卷。
單本（原來一本更無別翻合三百七十部一千七百八十六卷）。
右第一卷。
重翻（本是一經或有二重翻者乃至六重翻者合二百七十七部五百八十三卷）。
賢聖集傳（賢聖所撰翻譯有原合四十一部一百六十四卷）。
右第二卷（已前二卷三分合六百八十八部二千五百三十三卷入藏見錄）。
別生（於本部內抄出別行合八百一十部一千二百八十八卷）。
右第三卷。
疑偽（名雖似正義涉人造合二百九部四百九十一卷）。
右第四卷（已前二卷二分合一千一十九部一千七百七十九卷不須抄寫）。
闕本（舊錄有目而無經本合四百二部七百四十七卷請訪）。
右第五卷。
其序略云。別生疑偽不須抄寫。已外三分
入藏所收。至如法寶集之。流淨住子之類。
還同略抄例入別生。餘有僧傳等。詞參文
史體非淳正。事雖可尋義無在錄。內典錄
云。即今京輦通寫盛行。直列經名仍銓傳
譯。所略過半未足撿尋（撰錄者曰。余檢尋此錄。非無差謬。只如弘道廣
顯三昧經與阿耨達龍王經。此是一經兩名。俱云竺法護譯。存其兩本。一誤。又如普曜經八卷云西晉竺法護譯。闕
本錄中復云普曜經八卷亦云竺法護譯。見闕俱載。二誤。又入藏錄中普曜經八卷即云單本。闕本錄中復云重譯。
闕本前後差舛。三誤。真諦所譯攝大乘論十二卷者與十五卷者。卷雖增減文則不殊。今二本俱存。四誤。彌沙塞羯
磨闕本錄中前後重載。五誤。以隨願往生經遺教論等編為疑偽。六誤。餘在錄中。不能備記）。
大唐內典錄十卷（麟德元年甲子西明寺沙門釋道宣撰）
歷代眾經傳譯所從錄第一（謂代別出經及人述作無非通法並入經收故
隨經出）
後漢朝傳譯道俗一十二人所出經律等
（三百三十四部四百一十六卷失譯經一百二十五部一百四十八卷）
前魏朝傳譯僧六人所出經律等（一十三部二十五卷）
南吳孫氏傳譯道俗四人所出經傳等（一百四十
八部一百九十五卷失譯經一百一十部二百九十二卷）
西晉朝傳譯道俗一十三人所出經戒等（四百
四十六部七百一十三卷失譯經八部一十五卷）
東晉朝傳譯道俗二十七人所出經傳等（二百
六十四部五百七十四卷失譯經五十部五十四卷）
前秦符氏傳譯僧八人所出經傳等（四十部二百三十九
卷）
西秦乞伏氏傳譯僧一人所出經等（一十五部
二十二卷失譯經八部一十一卷）
後秦姚氏傳譯僧八人所出經傳等（一百二十四部六百
七十六卷）
北涼沮渠氏傳譯道俗九人所出經傳（三十四部
二百七十卷失譯經五部一十七卷）
宋朝傳譯道俗二十四人所出經傳（二百一十七部五百
三卷）
前齊朝傳譯道俗二十人所出經傳（一十二部三百九
十六卷）
梁朝傳譯道俗二十一人所出經律傳等（八十
九部九百三卷）
後魏元氏傳譯道俗一十四人所出經論傳
錄（八十八部二百九十八卷）
後齊高氏傳譯道俗二人所出經論（八部五十二卷）
後周宇文氏傳譯道俗一十一人所出經論
天文等（三十二部一百五卷）
陳朝傳譯道俗三人所出經論傳疏等（五十四部
二百五十一卷）

texts, which is the third error. The Xiangbu jing is an alternate title for the Wusuoxingwang jing, yet both titles are retained, which is the fourth error. The Puti wuxing jing is an alternate title for the Wenshushili wen puti jing, yet both recensions are retained, which is the fifth error. Placing the Sāṃkhya non-Buddhist treatise into the Mahāyāna section is the sixth error. In the Hīnayāna catalogue, the Dharmatrāta-dhyāna-sūtra and the Fujingguan jing are fundamentally the same sūtra; the 'contemplation of impurity' is named after its method, while 'Dharmatrāta' derives its appellation from the person, yet both works are retained, which is the seventh error. The Sarvâstivāda-vinaya in sixty-one fascicles and the Sarvâstivāda-vinaya in fifty-nine fascicles are not different texts; the sixty-one-fascicle version merely placed Vimalākṣa's Vinaya preface at the end, and the remainder is completely identical, yet the catalogue calls it a retranslation and retains both recensions, which is the eighth error. The 'Vinaya in Twenty-two [Stanzas]' is placed under the vinaya section, while the Mingliao lun is placed under the śāstra section, splitting a single title into two, which is the ninth error. Furthermore, that 'Vinaya in Twenty-two' is half the title of the Mingliao lun, yet retaining it now as a 'Vinaya in twenty-two fascicles' is a repeated mistake upon a mistake. As for the Fenbie gongde lun (Abhidharma treatise of the Fenbie gongde), in the chronological dynastic catalogue it is said to have been translated under the Song dynasty by Guṇabhadra together with Bodhiyaśas, yet in the canon entry it is recorded as having an unknown origin; this discrepancy between front and back is the tenth error. The others remain in the catalogue, but cannot be recounted in full).

Sui Catalogue of Buddhist Scriptures in Five Fascicles (Compiled in the second year of Renshou by imperial decree ordering the venerable elders of Xingshan Temple along with translating śramaṇas and scholars).
Totaling 2,109 works in 5,059 fascicles.
Sole translations (originally a single text with no other translation: totaling 370 works in 1,786 fascicles).
The above is the first fascicle.
Retranslations (originally a single scripture, with some translated twice or even up to six times: totaling 277 works in 583 fascicles).
Compilations and biographies of the sages and worthies (composed by sages and worthies, whose translations have an origin: totaling 41 works in 164 fascicles).
The above is the second fascicle. (The preceding two fascicles, comprising three categories, total 688 works in 2,533 fascicles, entered into the canon and found in the catalogue).
Extracted texts (excerpts copied out from their primary works to circulate separately: totaling 810 works in 1,288 fascicles).
The above is the third fascicle.
Doubtful and spurious texts (titles may seem genuine, but their doctrinal purport involves human fabrication: totaling 209 works in 491 fascicles).
The above is the fourth fascicle. (The preceding two fascicles, comprising two categories, total 1,019 works in 1,779 fascicles, and do not need to be copied).
Lost texts (titles are in older catalogues, but no manuscripts survive: totaling 402 works in 747 fascicles, sought for inquiry).
The above is the fifth fascicle.
Its preface states in brief: 'Extracted texts and doubtful or spurious texts need not be copied; the other three categories outside of these are collected and entered into the canon. Works such as the Fabao ji and Jingzhuzi are treated like abridgments and by rule entered into the extracted texts. Remaining works such as biographies of monks contain prose mingled with civil history and are not pure in style; although their events may be investigated, their doctrinal purport does not warrant inclusion in the catalogue.' The Neidian lu states: 'At present, throughout the capital, copying flourishes widely; it merely lists scripture titles and arranges their translations, but omits more than half, making it insufficient for reference.' (The compiler says: I have examined this catalogue, and it is not without errors. For instance, the Hongdao guangxian sanmei jing and the Anavatapta-nāgarāja-sūtra are two titles for a single scripture, yet both are said to be translated by Dharmarakṣa and both texts are retained, which is the first error. Furthermore, the Lalitavistara in eight fascicles is said to be translated by Dharmarakṣa of the Western Jin, but in the catalogue of lost texts, the Lalitavistara in eight fascicles is again said to be translated by Dharmarakṣa; recording it both as extant and lost is the second error. Again, in the catalogue of texts entered into the canon, the Lalitavistara in eight fascicles is called a sole translation, yet in the catalogue of lost texts it is called a retranslation; this contradiction between the extant and lost sections is the third error. The Mahāyānasaṃgraha in twelve fascicles and that in fifteen fascicles translated by Paramārtha, though varying in fascicle count, do not differ in text; yet now both recensions are retained, which is the fourth error. The Mahīśāsaka-karman is repeatedly recorded in the catalogue of lost texts, which is the fifth error. Categorizing the Suiyuan wangsheng jing and Yijiao lun as doubtful or spurious is the sixth error. The remainder in the catalogue cannot be fully noted).

Da Tang Neidian Lu in Ten Fascicles (Compiled in the first year of Linde, a jiazi year, by the śramaṇa Shi Daoxuan of Ximing Temple).
Chronological Account of the Transmission and Translation of All Scriptures from Successive Dynasties, Part 1 (referring to texts produced in individual dynasties and works composed by people, all of which convey the Dharma and are collected into the scriptures, hence they are set forth alongside the scriptures):
Twelve persons, both clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Later Han dynasty, and the scriptures, vinayas, etc. produced by them (334 works in 416 fascicles; anonymous translations: 125 works in 148 fascicles).
Six monks who transmitted and translated in the Former Wei dynasty, and the scriptures, vinayas, etc. produced by them (13 works in 25 fascicles).
Four persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Southern Wu of the Sun clan, and the scriptures, biographies, etc. produced by them (148 works in 195 fascicles; anonymous translations: 110 works in 292 fascicles).
Thirteen persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Western Jin dynasty, and the scriptures, precepts, etc. produced by them (446 works in 713 fascicles; anonymous translations: 8 works in 15 fascicles).
Twenty-seven persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Eastern Jin dynasty, and the scriptures, biographies, etc. produced by them (264 works in 574 fascicles; anonymous translations: 50 works in 54 fascicles).
Eight monks who transmitted and translated in the Former Qin of the Fu clan, and the scriptures, biographies, etc. produced by them (40 works in 239 fascicles).
One monk who transmitted and translated in the Western Qin of the Qifu clan, and the scriptures, etc. produced by him (15 works in 22 fascicles; anonymous translations: 8 works in 11 fascicles).
Eight monks who transmitted and translated in the Later Qin of the Yao clan, and the scriptures, biographies, etc. produced by them (124 works in 676 fascicles).
Nine persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Northern Liang of the Juqu clan, and the scriptures, biographies produced by them (34 works in 270 fascicles; anonymous translations: 5 works in 17 fascicles).
Twenty-four persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Song dynasty, and the scriptures, biographies produced by them (217 works in 503 fascicles).
Twenty persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Former Qi dynasty, and the scriptures, biographies produced by them (12 works in 396 fascicles).
Twenty-one persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Liang dynasty, and the scriptures, vinayas, biographies, etc. produced by them (89 works in 903 fascicles).
Fourteen persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Later Wei of the Yuan clan, and the scriptures, treatises, biographies, catalogues produced by them (88 works in 298 fascicles).
Two persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Northern Qi of the Gao clan, and the scriptures, treatises produced by them (8 works in 52 fascicles).
Eleven persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Northern Zhou of the Yuwen clan, and the scriptures, treatises, astronomy, etc. produced by them (32 works in 105 fascicles).
Three persons, clergy and laity, who transmitted and translated in the Chen dynasty, and the scriptures, treatises, biographies, commentaries, etc. produced by them (54 works in 251 fascicles).