貞元新定釋教目錄 18.4.3

18.4.3

出三藏記集卷第十三（安世高傳等十三）
出三藏記集卷第十四（鳩摩羅什傳等十）
出三藏記集卷第十五（白法祖傳等十）
（撰錄者曰。祐錄所撰條例可觀。若細尋求非無乖失只如第一卷前出經異記中云。舊經怛薩阿竭阿羅訶
三耶三佛。新經阿耨多羅三藐三菩提者。一誤。若新舊相對。應云舊經怛薩阿竭阿羅訶三耶三佛。新經多陀阿
伽度阿羅訶三藐三佛陀。舊經阿耨多羅三耶三菩。新經阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。二義全殊。不可交互。又如曇
摩羅剎與竺法護乃是一人。曇摩云法。羅剎言護。分為二人。二誤。異出經論錄中但名目相似。即云重譯。而不細
料簡。大小混雜。三誤。以舊灌頂藥師為宋朝惠簡抄撰編疑偽錄。四誤。又集序分之中與前譯人時有差
互不細相比對。五誤。比諸眾作乖謬全尠此亦璠璵之一玷也）。
隋眾經目錄七卷（一卷總錄開皇十四年勅翻經所法經等二十大德撰）
大乘修多羅藏錄一（六分合七百八十四部一千七百一十八卷）
眾經一譯分（合一百三十三部四百二十一卷）
眾經異譯分（合一百九十五部五百三十二卷）
眾經失譯分（合一百三十四部二百七十五卷）
眾經別生分（合二百二十一部二百六十四卷）
眾經疑惑分（合二十一部三十卷）
眾經偽妄分（合八十部一百九十六卷）
小乘修多羅藏錄二（六分合八百四十二部算得四十五部一千三百一卷算得三
百四卷）
眾經一譯分（合七十二部二百九十二卷）
眾經異譯分（合一百部三百七十卷）
眾經失譯分（合二百五十部二百七十二卷）
眾經別生分（合三百四十一部三百四十六卷）
眾經疑惑分（合二十九部三十一卷）
眾經偽妄分（合五十三部九十三卷）
大乘毘尼藏錄三（六分合五十部八十二卷）
眾律一譯分（合十二部三十二卷）
眾律異譯分（合七部七卷）
眾律失譯分（合一十二部一十四卷）
眾律別生分（合一十六部一十六卷）
眾律疑惑分（合一部二卷）
眾律偽妄分（合二部一十一卷）
小乘毘尼藏錄四（六分合六十三部三百八十一卷）
眾律一譯分（合一十五部一百九十八卷）
眾律異譯分（合八部一百二十六卷）
眾律失譯分（合二十九部四十五卷）
眾律別生分（合三部三卷）
眾律疑惑分（合六部六卷）
眾律偽妄分（合二部三卷）
大乘阿毘曇藏五（六分合六十八部二百八十一卷）
眾論一譯分（合四十二部二百六卷）
眾論異譯分（合八部五十二卷）
眾論失譯分（合一部二卷）
眾論別生分（合一十五部一十九卷）
眾論疑惑分（合一部一卷）
眾論偽妄分（合一部一卷）
小乘阿毘曇藏六（六分合一百一十六部四百八十二卷）
眾論一譯分（合一十四部二百七十六卷）
眾論異譯分（合八部六十六卷）
眾論失譯分（合五部二十二卷）
眾論別生分（合八十六部一百七卷）
眾論疑惑分（合一部一卷）
眾論偽妄分（合二部一十卷）
佛滅度後抄集錄七（二分合一百四十四部六百二十七卷）
西域賢聖抄集分（合四十八部一百一十九卷）
此方諸德抄集分（合九十六部五百八卷）
佛滅度後傳記錄八（二分合三十三部三十卷）
西域賢聖傳記分（合一十三部一百五十五卷）
此方諸德傳記分（合五十五部一百五十五卷）
佛滅度後著述錄九（二分合一百一十九部一百三十四卷）
西域聖賢著述分（合一十五部一十九卷）
此方諸德著述分（合一百四部一百一十五卷）
右九錄合二千二百五十七部五千三百一
十卷（算得二千二百五十四部五千一百九十一卷細勘別錄部卷復與總錄不同）。
分為六卷總錄第七合為十卷。
（撰錄者曰。余撿尋此餘非無差錯。即如曇摩羅剎晉言法護。總是一人。錄中分二。云出須真天子經二卷編為
重譯。不識梵晉之言。一誤也。如律二十二明了論。總是一經錄中分為二部。律二十二卷編在律中。明了論一卷在

Chu sanzang ji ji, fascicle 13 (Biographies of An Shigao and others, 13).
Chu sanzang ji ji, fascicle 14 (Biographies of Kumārajīva and others, 10).
Chu sanzang ji ji, fascicle 15 (Biographies of Bo Fazu and others, 10).
(The compiler says: The structural principles devised in Sengyou's catalogue are impressive. Yet if one examines them closely, errors are not lacking. For example, in fascicle 1, in the former "Account of Variant Translations of Sūtras," it says: "In the old translations, [it was] dasa'ajie aluohe sanyesanfo (tathāgato ’rhan samyaksaṃbuddhaḥ); in the new translations, anouduoluo sanmiaosanputi (anuttarasamyaksaṃbodhi)." This is the first mistake. If one correlates the old and new, one should say: "In the old translations, dasa'ajie aluohe sanyesanfo; in the new translations, duotuo'ajiedu aluohe sanmiaosanfeduo. In the old translations, anouduoluo sanyesanpu; in the new translations, anouduoluo sanmiaosanputi." These two meanings are entirely distinct and must not be conflated. Furthermore, Dharmarakṣa (Tanmoluochai) and Zhu Fahu are simply one person—tanmo means "dharma" (fa) and luochai means "protection" (hu)—yet he divided them into two persons. This is the second mistake. In the catalogue of variant translations of sūtras and treatises, whenever the titles were merely similar, he immediately called them re-translations without making a careful critical distinction, conflating Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna. This is the third mistake. Regarding the old Guanding Yaoshi [jing], he treated it as an excerpted compilation by Huijian of the Song dynasty and entered it into the catalogue of doubtful and apocryphal works. This is the fourth mistake. In addition, within the collection of prefaces, there are frequent discrepancies with the previously listed translators and eras, lacking meticulous cross-checking. This is the fifth mistake. Compared to other works, however, its blunders are exceedingly few; this is merely a minor blemish on a precious gem).
Sui Catalogue of the Various Sūtras in seven fascicles (One fascicle of General Catalogue; compiled by twenty Venerable Masters including Fajing at the imperial translation bureau in the fourteenth year of Kaihuang).
Mahāyāna Sūtrapiṭaka Catalogue 1 (six sections, total 784 works in 1,718 fascicles):
Various sūtras in single translations section (total 133 works in 421 fascicles);
Various sūtras in variant translations section (total 195 works in 532 fascicles);
Various sūtras with lost translators section (total 134 works in 275 fascicles);
Various sūtras of separate extractions section (total 221 works in 264 fascicles);
Various sūtras of doubtful authenticity section (total 21 works in 30 fascicles);
Various sūtras of apocryphal fabrication section (total 80 works in 196 fascicles).
Hīnayāna Sūtrapiṭaka Catalogue 2 (six sections, total 842 works—recalculated as [8]45 works—in 1,301 fascicles—recalculated as [1,]304 fascicles):
Various sūtras in single translations section (total 72 works in 292 fascicles);
Various sūtras in variant translations section (total 100 works in 370 fascicles);
Various sūtras with lost translators section (total 250 works in 272 fascicles);
Various sūtras of separate extractions section (total 341 works in 346 fascicles);
Various sūtras of doubtful authenticity section (total 29 works in 31 fascicles);
Various sūtras of apocryphal fabrication section (total 53 works in 93 fascicles).
Mahāyāna Vinayapiṭaka Catalogue 3 (six sections, total 50 works in 82 fascicles):
Various vinayas in single translations section (total 12 works in 32 fascicles);
Various vinayas in variant translations section (total 7 works in 7 fascicles);
Various vinayas with lost translators section (total 12 works in 14 fascicles);
Various vinayas of separate extractions section (total 16 works in 16 fascicles);
Various vinayas of doubtful authenticity section (total 1 work in 2 fascicles);
Various vinayas of apocryphal fabrication section (total 2 works in 11 fascicles).
Hīnayāna Vinayapiṭaka Catalogue 4 (six sections, total 63 works in 381 fascicles):
Various vinayas in single translations section (total 15 works in 198 fascicles);
Various vinayas in variant translations section (total 8 works in 126 fascicles);
Various vinayas with lost translators section (total 29 works in 45 fascicles);
Various vinayas of separate extractions section (total 3 works in 3 fascicles);
Various vinayas of doubtful authenticity section (total 6 works in 6 fascicles);
Various vinayas of apocryphal fabrication section (total 2 works in 3 fascicles).
Mahāyāna Abhidharmapiṭaka 5 (six sections, total 68 works in 281 fascicles):
Various treatises in single translations section (total 42 works in 206 fascicles);
Various treatises in variant translations section (total 8 works in 52 fascicles);
Various treatises with lost translators section (total 1 work in 2 fascicles);
Various treatises of separate extractions section (total 15 works in 19 fascicles);
Various treatises of doubtful authenticity section (total 1 work in 1 fascicle);
Various treatises of apocryphal fabrication section (total 1 work in 1 fascicle).
Hīnayāna Abhidharmapiṭaka 6 (six sections, total 116 works in 482 fascicles):
Various treatises in single translations section (total 14 works in 276 fascicles);
Various treatises in variant translations section (total 8 works in 66 fascicles);
Various treatises with lost translators section (total 5 works in 22 fascicles);
Various treatises of separate extractions section (total 86 works in 107 fascicles);
Various treatises of doubtful authenticity section (total 1 work in 1 fascicle);
Various treatises of apocryphal fabrication section (total 2 works in 10 fascicles).
Catalogue of Excerpted Compilations after the Buddha's Nirvāṇa 7 (two sections, total 144 works in 627 fascicles):
Excerpted compilations by sages and saints of the Western Regions section (total 48 works in 119 fascicles);
Excerpted compilations by various masters of this land section (total 96 works in 508 fascicles).
Catalogue of Biographies after the Buddha's Nirvāṇa 8 (two sections, total 33 works in 30 fascicles):
Biographies of sages and saints of the Western Regions section (total 13 works in 155 fascicles);
Biographies of various masters of this land section (total 55 works in 155 fascicles).
Catalogue of Compositions after the Buddha's Nirvāṇa 9 (two sections, total 119 works in 134 fascicles):
Compositions by sages and saints of the Western Regions section (total 15 works in 19 fascicles);
Compositions by various masters of this land section (total 104 works in 115 fascicles).
The above nine catalogues total 2,257 works in 5,310 fascicles (recalculated as 2,254 works in 5,191 fascicles; a detailed audit of the Detailed Catalogue's works and fascicles also differs from the General Catalogue).
Divided into six fascicles, with the General Catalogue as the seventh, making ten fascicles in all.
(The compiler says: In examining the rest of this, errors are not lacking. For instance, Tanmoluochai is in the Jin language Zhu Fahu; they are completely the same person. In the catalogue, he is divided into two, stating that he produced the Xuzhen tianzi jing in two fascicles and classifying it as a re-translation, failing to recognize Sanskrit and Jin words; this is the first mistake. As for the Lü ershi'er mingliao lun, it is entirely a single text, yet in the catalogue it is divided into two works: the Lü [in] twenty-two fascicles is classified among the Vinaya, while the Mingliao lun in one fascicle is in