貞元新定釋教目錄 18.4.4

18.4.4

於論錄。一經之題分二錄上。二誤。其律二十二乃是明了論半題今云二十二卷。誤之甚也。真諦譯十二
卷者。二本不殊。在其二部。而言重譯。三誤也。以仁王經起信論等編在疑四誤也。不能備陳略述如此）。
隋開皇三寶錄一十五卷（內題云歷代三寶紀）
開皇十七年興善寺翻經學士成都費長房
撰
歷代三寶紀第一（帝年上周秦）。
從周莊王代十年甲午。至秦始皇帝子子
嬰甲午年。凡二十六主四百八十一載。
歷代三寶紀第二（帝年次前漢新室後漢）。
從前漢高帝元年乙未。至後漢獻帝建安
二十四年己亥。凡二十六君四百一十五
載。
歷代三寶紀第三（帝年下魏晉宋齊梁周錄）。
從魏文帝黃初元年庚子。至隋開皇十七
年丁巳。凡四十主三百七十八載。
歷代三寶紀第四　譯經　後漢。
右從明帝永平十年丁卯。至獻帝末年歷
一十一主一百五十二年。華戎道俗十有
二人并古失譯。合出經律三百三十四部
四百一十六卷。
歷代三寶紀第五　譯經　魏吳。
右魏吳兩代道俗十人所出經律羯磨并舊
失譯。合三百一十二部四百八十二卷。
歷代三寶紀第六　譯經　西晉。
右西晉代華戎道俗十有三人并前失譯
諸經戒等。合四百五十一部七百一十七
卷。
歷代三寶紀第七　譯經　東晉。
右東晉代華戎道俗二十七人而所出經
并舊失譯。合二百六十三部五百八十五
卷。
歷代三寶紀第八（譯經姚秦符秦）。
右二秦之代華戎釋種一十六人。合出經
論傳等一百六十四部九百四卷。
歷代三寶紀第九（譯經西秦北涼元魏高齊陳代）。
右五代緇素共二十七人所出三藏記錄
等并及失譯。合二百三部八百五十五卷。
歷代三寶紀第十　譯經　宋。
右宋代華戎道俗二十三人。出經律論及
傳錄等。凡二百一十部四百九十卷。
歷代三寶紀第十一　譯經　齊梁周。
右三代緇素共五十一人。出經律論及傳
錄等。一百六十二部一千三百三十六卷。
歷代三寶紀第十二　譯經　大隋。
右隋代華戎緇素十有九人所翻新文。及
新舊本論傳法式。合七十五部四百六十
二卷。
歷代三寶紀第十三（大乘錄入藏目）五百五十一部一
千五百八十六卷。
修多羅有譯一（二百三十四部八百八十五卷）
修多羅失譯二（二百三十五部四百二卷）
毘尼有譯三（一十九部四十卷）
毘尼失譯四（一十二部一十四卷）
阿毘曇有譯五（四十九部二百三十八卷）
阿毘曇失譯六（二部七卷）
歷代三寶紀第十四（小乘錄入藏目）五百二十五部一
千七百三十九卷（錄云七百一十二卷者誤）。
修多羅有譯一（一百八部五百二十七卷）
修多羅失譯二（三百一十六部四百八十二卷）
毘尼有譯三（三十九部二百八十五卷）
毘尼失譯四（三十一部六十七卷）
阿毘曇有譯五（三十一部三百五十一卷）
阿毘曇失譯六（一十部二十七卷）
開皇三寶錄總目一卷（內典錄云房錄所出經律論傳總二千一百四十六部六
千二百三十五卷非入藏數算得七十四部三十七卷與內典不同）
右兼總目共成一十五卷（其第十三十四大小乘入藏一千七十六部
三千三百二十五卷房錄本數三千二百九十二卷者計數錯也）。
內典錄云。房所撰者入藏之中。凡互相
謬。得在繁富。未可覆通。非無憑准。未可
偏削（撰錄者曰。余撿長房入藏錄中。事實雜謬。其𨷂本疑偽皆編入藏。竊為不可。又如大乘錄中賢劫經。
賢劫三昧經。此是一經兩名。今存二部。一誤。須菩提品及長天子經須真天子問四事經亦一經兩名重載二
部。三誤。象步經即無所希望經異名各存四誤。菩提無所行經即文殊問菩提經。異名存其二本。五誤。以僧佉
外道入大乘中。六誤。小乘錄中達摩多羅禪經與不淨觀禪德總是一經。其不淨觀約法為名達摩多羅。就
人立稱二部俱存。七誤。十誦律六十一卷。十誦律五十九卷。二本不殊。其六十一卷者卑摩羅叉加毘尼序置之

to the Śāstra Catalogue, dividing the title of a single text into two catalogues: this is the second error. As for the Vinaya in twenty-two fascicles, that is actually part of the title of the *Mingliao lun* (Clear Meaning Treatise), yet here it is called 'twenty-two fascicles'—an extreme error! Paramārtha translated it in twelve fascicles; the two texts do not differ. Placing them into two sections and calling them separate translations is the third error. Placing the *Benevolent Kings Sūtra* (*Renwang jing*), the *Awakening of Faith* (*Qixin lun*), and others among the doubtful works is the fourth error. Being unable to present everything in detail, I have summarized it briefly in this way.)

Sui dynasty *Kaihuang Sanbao lu* (Kaihuang Record of the Three Jewels) in fifteen fascicles (titled inside as the *Lidai sanbao ji* [Chronicle of the Three Jewels Through the Ages])
Compiled in the seventeenth year of Kaihuang by Fei Changfang, Scholar of the Translation Bureau of Xingshan Monastery, from Chengdu.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 1 (Imperial Chronology, Part 1: Zhou and Qin).
From the tenth year of King Zhuang of the Zhou dynasty (jiawu) to the year jiawu of Ziying, son of the First Emperor of Qin, a total of 26 rulers and 481 years.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 2 (Imperial Chronology, Part 2: Former Han, Xin Dynasty, and Later Han).
From the first year of Emperor Gao of the Former Han (yiwei) to the twenty-fourth year of Jian'an under Emperor Xian of the Later Han (yihai), a total of 26 rulers and 415 years.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 3 (Imperial Chronology, Part 3: Records of Wei, Jin, Song, Qi, Liang, and Zhou).
From the first year of Huangchu of Emperor Wen of Wei (gengzi) to the seventeenth year of Kaihuang of the Sui dynasty (dingsi), a total of 40 rulers and 378 years.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 4: Translated Sūtras: Later Han.
Above: from the tenth year of Yongping of Emperor Ming (dingmao) to the final years of Emperor Xian, spanning 11 rulers and 152 years. Twelve monastic and lay individuals, Chinese and foreign, together with ancient texts of lost translator, produced a total of 334 works of sūtras and vinaya in 416 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 5: Translated Sūtras: Wei and Wu.
Above: produced by ten monastic and lay individuals of the two dynasties of Wei and Wu—sūtras, vinaya, and karmavācanā—together with old texts of lost translator, amounting to a total of 312 works in 482 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 6: Translated Sūtras: Western Jin.
Above: produced during the Western Jin dynasty by thirteen monastic and lay individuals, Chinese and foreign, together with previous lost translations of various sūtras and precepts, amounting to a total of 451 works in 717 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 7: Translated Sūtras: Eastern Jin.
Above: produced during the Eastern Jin dynasty by twenty-seven monastic and lay individuals, Chinese and foreign, together with old texts of lost translator, amounting to a total of 263 works in 585 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 8 (Translated Sūtras: Yao Qin and Fu Qin).
Above: during the era of the two Qin dynasties, sixteen monks, Chinese and foreign, together produced 164 works of sūtras, treatises, biographies, etc., in 904 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 9 (Translated Sūtras: Western Qin, Northern Liang, Yuan Wei, Northern Qi, and Chen Dynasties).
Above: during the five dynasties, twenty-seven monastic and lay individuals produced records of the Tripiṭaka, etc., together with lost translations, amounting to a total of 203 works in 855 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 10: Translated Sūtras: Song.
Above: twenty-three monastic and lay individuals, Chinese and foreign, of the Song dynasty produced sūtras, vinaya, treatises, biographies, catalogues, etc., amounting to a total of 210 works in 490 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 11: Translated Sūtras: Qi, Liang, and Zhou.
Above: fifty-one monastic and lay individuals across the three dynasties produced sūtras, vinaya, treatises, biographies, catalogues, etc., amounting to 162 works in 1,336 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 12: Translated Sūtras: Great Sui.
Above: nineteen monastic and lay individuals, Chinese and foreign, of the Sui dynasty translated new texts, as well as new and old treatises, biographies, and liturgical regulations, amounting to a total of 75 works in 462 fascicles.
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 13 (Catalogue of Mahāyāna Texts Entered into the Canon): 551 works in 1,586 fascicles.
1. Sūtras with Known Translators (234 works in 885 fascicles)
2. Sūtras with Lost Translators (235 works in 402 fascicles)
3. Vinaya with Known Translators (19 works in 40 fascicles)
4. Vinaya with Lost Translators (12 works in 14 fascicles)
5. Abhidharma with Known Translators (49 works in 238 fascicles)
6. Abhidharma with Lost Translators (2 works in 7 fascicles)
*Lidai sanbao ji*, Fascicle 14 (Catalogue of Hīnayāna Texts Entered into the Canon): 525 works in 1,739 fascicles (the catalogue states 712 fascicles, which is an error).
1. Sūtras with Known Translators (108 works in 527 fascicles)
2. Sūtras with Lost Translators (316 works in 482 fascicles)
3. Vinaya with Known Translators (39 works in 285 fascicles)
4. Vinaya with Lost Translators (31 works in 67 fascicles)
5. Abhidharma with Known Translators (31 works in 351 fascicles)
6. Abhidharma with Lost Translators (10 works in 27 fascicles)
*Kaihuang Sanbao lu* General Table of Contents in one fascicle (The *Neidian lu* states that the sūtras, vinaya, treatises, and biographies recorded in Fang's catalogue total 2,146 works in 6,235 fascicles; this is not the count of works entered into the canon; calculating it yields 74 works in 37 fascicles, which differs from the *Neidian lu*).
Above: including the general table of contents, it comprises fifteen fascicles in total (Fascicles 13 and 14, comprising Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna works entered into the canon, amount to 1,076 works in 3,325 fascicles; the original count in Fang's catalogue of 3,292 fascicles is a calculation error).
The *Neidian lu* states: "Among those compiled by Fang entered into the canon, there are mutual errors throughout. Its merit lies in its rich abundance, which cannot be wholly superseded. It is not without basis, and must not be biasedly excised." (The compiler notes: I have examined the catalogue of works entered into the canon by Changfang; its facts and matters are mixed and erroneous. Incomplete texts and doubtful or apocryphal works are all entered into the canon, which I humbly consider unacceptable. Furthermore, for instance, in the Mahāyāna catalogue, the *Bhadrakalpika-sūtra* (*Xianjie jing*) and the *Bhadrakalpa-samādhi-sūtra* (*Xianjie sanmei jing*) are two titles for one sūtra, yet both are preserved as two works: this is the first error. The *Subhūti Chapter* (*Xuboti pin*) and the *Devaputra Dīrgha Sūtra* (*Zhang tianzi jing*), and the *Devaputra Sucinti's Inquiry into the Four Matters Sūtra* (*Xuzhen tianzi wen sishi jing*), are likewise two titles for one sūtra, yet repeatedly recorded as two works: this is the third error. The *Elephant Pace Sūtra* (*Xiangbu jing*) is an alternate title for the *Sūtra of Having No Longing* (*Wu suoxiwang jing*), yet both are preserved: this is the fourth error. The *Bodhipracāra-sūtra* (*Puti wusuoxing jing*) is the *Mañjuśrīparipṛcchābodhi-sūtra* (*Wenshu wen puti jing*), yet both texts are preserved under their alternate titles: this is the fifth error. Including Sāṃkhya non-Buddhists under the Mahāyāna is the sixth error. In the Hīnayāna catalogue, the *Dharmatrāta Dhyāna Sūtra* (*Damoduoluo chan jing*) and the *Impurities Contemplation Dhyāna Virtues* (*Bujingguan chande*) are altogether one single sūtra: 'Impurities Contemplation' takes its title from the teaching, while 'Dharmatrāta' establishes its title from the person; preserving both as two works is the seventh error. The *Sarvâstivāda-vinaya* (*Shi song lü*) in sixty-one fascicles and the *Sarvâstivāda-vinaya* in fifty-nine fascicles are not different texts: the sixty-one fascicle edition had a vinaya preface added by Vimalâkṣa, who placed it