四分戒本疏卷第一．第二．第三 3.94

3.94

若比丘語餘比丘如是言大德共至聚落當與汝等食彼比丘竟不教與是比丘食語言汝一處若坐若語不樂我獨坐獨語以此因緣非餘方便遣他去波逸提　此滿足戒本文有三句。一犯人。二語餘下至與汝食。正明將至聚落許與彼食。三彼比丘竟不。已下不與彼食遣去結罪。以此因緣者。謂是惱亂因緣。非餘者。非餘不犯等緣如上無威儀等。辨相者初句可知。言聚落者。有四種村如上。言與食者。謂是五正明。律云。若方便捨見處至聞處犯吉。互作亦吉。見聞俱離犯提。律云。不犯者。與食遣去。若病若無威儀人見不喜自送食與。若破戒破見等故。若命梵等難。若無瞋恨亦無慊心。悉皆不犯。

"If a bhikṣu says to another bhikṣu, 'Venerable, let us go together to the village, and I will give you food,' and that bhikṣu in the end does not have food given to this bhikṣu, saying to him, 'It is not pleasing to me to sit together or talk together with you in one place; I prefer to sit alone and talk alone'—if, for this reason and no other, he drives him away by expedient means, it is a prāyaścittika." The complete text of this precept contains three clauses: first, the offender; second, from "says to another" down to "will give you food," which directly explains taking him to the village and promising to give him food; third, from "that bhikṣu in the end does not" onward, which explains not giving him food and driving him away, establishing the offense. "For this reason" refers to the reason of troubling and distressing him. "No other" means no other condition of non-offense, such as the above-mentioned lack of deportment. In defining the marks, the first clause is understood. Regarding "village": there are four kinds of villages as explained above. Regarding "giving food": this refers to the five standard foods. The Vinaya says, "If by expedient means he leaves the place of sight and goes to a place of hearing, he commits a duṣkṛta; doing the reverse is also a duṣkṛta; leaving both sight and hearing constitutes a prāyaścittika." The Vinaya says regarding non-offenses: "If he drives him away after giving him food; or if the other is sick, or lacks deportment so that people are displeased to see him, and he himself delivers food to him; or on account of breaking the precepts, breaking views, and so forth; or if there is danger to life or brahmacarya; or if he has neither anger nor resentment, none of these is an offense."