Viyahapannatti 1.9.95

1.9.95

sattame ṇaṃ bhaṃte! ovāsaṃtare kiṃ garue? lahue? garuyalahue? agaruyalahue?
goyamā! no garue, no lahue, no garuyalahue, agaruyalahue|
sattame ṇaṃ bhaṃte! tanuvāe kiṃ garue? lahue? garuyalahue? agaruyalahue?
goyamā! no garue, no lahue, garuyalahue, no agaruyalahue|
evaṃ sattame ghanavāe, sattame ghanodahī, sattamā puḍhavī|
ovāsaṃtarāiṃ savvāiṃ jahā sattame ovāsaṃtare|
jahā tanuvāe evaṃ–ovāsa-vāya-ghanaudahī, puḍhavī dīvā ya sāgarā vāsā|
neraiyā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ garuyā? lahuyā? garuyalahuyā? agaruyalahuyā?
goyamā! no garuyā, no lahuyā, garuyalahuyā vi, agaruyalahuyā vi|
se keṇaṭṭheṇaṃ bhaṃte! evaṃ vuccai–neraiyā no garuyā? no lahuyā? garuyalahuyā vi? agaruyalahuyā vi?
goyamā! viuvviya-teyāiṃ paḍucca no garuyā, no lahuyā, garuyalahuyā, no agaruyalahuyā| jīvaṃ ca kammagaṃ ca paḍucca no garuyā, no lahuyā, no garuyalahuyā, agaruyalahuyā| se teṇaṭṭheṇaṃ goyamā! evaṃ vuccai–neraiyā no garuyā, no lahuyā, garuyalahuyā vi, agaruyalahuyā vi|
evaṃ jāva vemāṇiyā, navaraṃ–nāṇattaṃ jāṇiyavvaṃ sarīrehiṃ|
dhammatthikāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ garue? lahue? garuyalahue? agaruyalahue?
goyamā! no garue, no lahue, no garuyalahue, agaruyalahue|
ahammatthikāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ garue? lahue? garuyalahue? agaruyalahue?
goyamā! no garue, no lahue, no garuyalahue, agaruyalahue|
āgāsatthikāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ garue? lahue? garuyalahue? agaruyalahue?
goyamā! no garue, no lahue, no garuyalahue, agaruyalahue|
jīvatthikāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ garue? lahue? garuyalahue? agaruyalahue?
goyamā! no garue, no lahue, no garuyalahue, agaruyalahue|
poggalatthikāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ garue? lahue? garuyalahue? agaruyalahue?
goyamā! no garue, no lahue, garuyalahue vi, agaruyalahue vi|
se keṇaṭṭheṇaṃ bhaṃte! evaṃ vuccai–ṇo garue? no lahue? garuyalahue vi? agaruyalahue vi?
goyamā! garuyalahuyadavvāiṃ paḍucca no garue, no lahue, garuyalahue, no agaruyalahue| agaruyalahuyadavvāiṃ paḍucca no garue, no lahue, no garuyalahue, agaruyalahue|
samayā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ garuyā? lahuyā? garuyalahuyā? agaruyalahuyā?
goyamā! no garuyā, no lahuyā, no garuyalahuyā, agaruyalahuyā|
kammāṇi ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ garuyāiṃ? lahuyāiṃ? garuyalahuyāiṃ? agaruyalahuyāiṃ?
goyamā! no garuyāiṃ, no lahuyāiṃ, no garuyalahuyāiṃ, agaruyalahuyāiṃ|
kaṇhalessā ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ garuyā? lahuyā? garuyalahuyā? agaruyalahuyā?
goyamā! no garuyā, no lahuyā, garuyalahuyā vi, agaruyalahuyā vi|
se keṇaṭṭheṇaṃ bhaṃte! evaṃ vuccai–kaṇhalessā no garuyā? no lahuyā? garuyalahuyā vi? agaruyalahuyā vi?
goyamā! davvalessaṃ paḍucca tatiyapadeṇaṃ, bhāvalessaṃ paḍucca cautthapadeṇaṃ|
evaṃ jāva sukkalesā|
diṭṭhī-daṃsaṇa-nāṇa-annāṇaṃ-saṇṇāo cautthaeṇaṃ padeṇaṃ netavvāo|
heṭṭhillā cattāri sarīrā neyavvā tatieṇaṃ padeṇaṃ| kammayaṃ cautthaeṇaṃ padeṇaṃ|
manajogo, vaijogo cautthaeṇaṃ padeṇaṃ, kāyajogo tatieṇaṃ padeṇaṃ|
sāgārovaogo, anāgārovaogo cautthaeṇaṃ padeṇaṃ|
savvadavvā, savvapaesā, savvapajjavā jahā poggalatthikāo|
tītaddhā, anāgataddhā, savvaddhā cautthaeṇaṃ padeṇaṃ|

"Venerable Sir, is the seventh intermediate space heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, it is not heavy, not light, not heavy-and-light; it is neither-heavy-nor-light."
"Venerable Sir, is the seventh thin-air layer heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, it is not heavy, not light; it is heavy-and-light, not neither-heavy-nor-light."
In the same manner, the seventh dense-air layer, the seventh dense-water layer, and the seventh earth [are to be understood].
All intermediate spaces are just like the seventh intermediate space.
As with the thin-air layer, so with the intermediate spaces, winds, dense-water layers, earths, continents, oceans, and regions.
"Venerable Sir, are hell beings heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, they are not heavy, not light; they are both heavy-and-light and neither-heavy-nor-light."
"For what reason, Venerable Sir, is it said: 'Hell beings are not heavy, not light, both heavy-and-light and neither-heavy-nor-light'?"
"Gautama, in reference to the transformational and fiery [bodies], they are not heavy, not light; they are heavy-and-light, not neither-heavy-nor-light. In reference to the soul and the karmic [body], they are not heavy, not light, not heavy-and-light; they are neither-heavy-nor-light. For that reason, Gautama, it is said: 'Hell beings are not heavy, not light, both heavy-and-light and neither-heavy-nor-light.'"
In the same manner up to the celestial beings, with the distinction that diversity should be understood through the bodies.
"Venerable Sir, is the medium of motion heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, it is not heavy, not light, not heavy-and-light; it is neither-heavy-nor-light."
"Venerable Sir, is the medium of rest heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, it is not heavy, not light, not heavy-and-light; it is neither-heavy-nor-light."
"Venerable Sir, is space heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, it is not heavy, not light, not heavy-and-light; it is neither-heavy-nor-light."
"Venerable Sir, is the medium of souls heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, it is not heavy, not light, not heavy-and-light; it is neither-heavy-nor-light."
"Venerable Sir, is the medium of physical matter heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, it is not heavy, not light; it is both heavy-and-light and neither-heavy-nor-light."
"For what reason, Venerable Sir, is it said: 'It is not heavy, not light, both heavy-and-light and neither-heavy-nor-light'?"
"Gautama, in reference to heavy-and-light substances, it is not heavy, not light; it is heavy-and-light, not neither-heavy-nor-light. In reference to neither-heavy-nor-light substances, it is not heavy, not light, not heavy-and-light; it is neither-heavy-nor-light."
"Venerable Sir, are time units heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, they are not heavy, not light, not heavy-and-light; they are neither-heavy-nor-light."
"Venerable Sir, are karmas heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, they are not heavy, not light, not heavy-and-light; they are neither-heavy-nor-light."
"Venerable Sir, is black lesyā heavy, light, heavy-and-light, or neither-heavy-nor-light?"
"Gautama, it is not heavy, not light; it is both heavy-and-light and neither-heavy-nor-light."
"For what reason, Venerable Sir, is it said: 'Black lesyā is not heavy, not light, both heavy-and-light and neither-heavy-nor-light'?"
"Gautama, in reference to substance-lesyā, [it is explained] by the third alternative; in reference to state-lesyā, by the fourth alternative."
In the same manner up to white lesyā.
View, perception, knowledge, non-knowledge, and instincts are to be conveyed by the fourth alternative.
The lower four bodies are to be conveyed by the third alternative; the karmic [body], by the fourth alternative.
Mental activity and vocal activity are [conveyed] by the fourth alternative; bodily activity, by the third alternative.
Articulate application and inarticulate application are [conveyed] by the fourth alternative.
All substances, all spatial points, and all modes are [to be understood] just like the medium of physical matter.
Past time, future time, and all time are [conveyed] by the fourth alternative.