Viyahapannatti 25.6.902-905
Viyāhapannatti 25.6.902-905
- Language
- Ardhamāgadhī Prakrit
25.6.902
pulāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ sarāge hojjā? vītarāge hojjā?
goyamā! sarāge hojjā, no vītarāge hojjā| evaṃ jāva kasāyakusīle|
niyaṃṭhe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ sarāge hojjā–pucchā|
goyamā! no sarāge hojjā, vītarāge hojjā|
jai vītarāge hojjā kiṃ uvasaṃtakasāyavītarāge hojjā? khīṇakasāyavītarāge hojjā?
goyamā! uvasaṃtakasāyavītarāge vā hojjā, khīṇakasāyavītarāge vā hojjā| siṇāe evaṃ ceva, navaraṃ–no uvasaṃtakasāyavītarāge hojjā, khīṇakasāyavītarāge hojjā|
"Venerable Sir! Would a pulāka be with passion or free from passion?"
"Gautama! He would be with passion, not free from passion. Likewise up to the kasāyakusīla."
"Venerable Sir! Would a nirgrantha be with passion...?"—the question.
"Gautama! He would not be with passion; he would be free from passion."
"If he is free from passion, would he be one whose passions are pacified, free from passion, or one whose passions are destroyed, free from passion?"
"Gautama! He may be one whose passions are pacified, free from passion, or he may be one whose passions are destroyed, free from passion. So also the snātaka, with the difference: he would not be one whose passions are pacified, free from passion; he would be one whose passions are destroyed, free from passion."
25.6.903
pulāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ ṭhiyakappe hojjā? aṭṭhiyakappe hojjā?
goyamā! ṭhiyakappe vā hojjā, aṭṭhiyakappe vā hojjā| evaṃ jāva siṇāe|
pulāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ jinakappe hojjā? therakappe hojjā? kappātīte hojjā?
goyamā! no jinakappe hojjā, therakappe hojjā, no kappātīte hojjā|
bause ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! jinakappe vā hojjā, therakappe vā hojjā, no kappātīte hojjā| evaṃ paḍisevaṇākusīle vi|
kasāyakusīle ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! jinakappe vā hojjā, therakappe vā hojjā, kappātīte vā hojjā|
niyaṃṭhe ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! no jinakappe hojjā, no therakappe hojjā, kappātīte hojjā| evaṃ siṇāe vi|
"Venerable Sir! Would a pulāka be of fixed conduct, or not of fixed conduct?"
"Gautama! He may be of fixed conduct, or he may not be of fixed conduct. Likewise up to the snātaka."
"Venerable Sir! Would a pulāka be in the practice of the Jinas, or in the practice of the elders, or beyond conduct?"
"Gautama! He would not be in the practice of the Jinas; he would be in the practice of the elders; he would not be beyond conduct."
"Regarding the bakuśa..."—the question.
"Gautama! He may be in the practice of the Jinas, or he may be in the practice of the elders; he would not be beyond conduct. Likewise also the paḍisevaṇākusīla."
"Regarding the kasāyakusīla..."—the question.
"Gautama! He may be in the practice of the Jinas, or he may be in the practice of the elders, or he may be beyond conduct."
"Regarding the nirgrantha..."—the question.
"Gautama! He would not be in the practice of the Jinas, nor would he be in the practice of the elders; he would be beyond conduct. Likewise also the snātaka."
25.6.904
pulāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ sāmāiyasaṃjame hojjā? cheovaṭṭhāvaṇiyasaṃjame hojjā? parihāravisuddhiyasaṃjame hojjā? suhumasaṃparāgasaṃjame hojjā? ahakkhāyasaṃjame hojjā?
goyamā! sāmāiyasaṃjame vā hojjā, cheovaṭṭhāvaṇiyasaṃjame vā hojjā, no parihāravisuddhiyasaṃjame hojjā, no suhumasaṃparāgasaṃjame hojjā, no ahakkhāyasaṃjame hojjā| evaṃ bause vi| evaṃ paḍisevaṇākusīle vi|
kasāyakusīle ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! sāmāiyasaṃjame vā hojjā jāva suhumasaṃparāgasaṃjame vā hojjā, no ahakkhāyasaṃjame hojjā|
niyaṃṭhe ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! no sāmāiyasaṃjame hojjā jāva no suhumasaṃparāgasaṃjame hojjā, ahakkhāyasaṃjame hojjā| evaṃ siṇāe vi|
"Venerable Sir! Would a pulāka be in sāmāyika self-restraint, in chedopasthāpanīya self-restraint, in parihāraviśuddhi self-restraint, in sūkṣmasaṃparāya self-restraint, [or] in yathākhyāta self-restraint?"
"Gautama! He may be in sāmāyika self-restraint, or he may be in chedopasthāpanīya self-restraint; he would not be in parihāraviśuddhi self-restraint, nor in sūkṣmasaṃparāya self-restraint, nor in yathākhyāta self-restraint. Likewise also the bakuśa. Likewise also the paḍisevaṇākusīla."
"Regarding the kasāyakusīla..."—the question.
"Gautama! He may be in sāmāyika self-restraint up to he may be in sūkṣmasaṃparāya self-restraint; he would not be in yathākhyāta self-restraint."
"Regarding the nirgrantha..."—the question.
"Gautama! He would not be in sāmāyika self-restraint up to nor in sūkṣmasaṃparāya self-restraint; he would be in yathākhyāta self-restraint. Likewise also the snātaka."
25.6.905
pulāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ paḍisevae hojjā? apaḍisevae hojjā?
goyamā! paḍisevae hojjā, no apaḍisevae hojjā|
jai paḍisevae hojjā kiṃ mūlaguṇapaḍisevae hojjā? uttaraguṇapaḍisevae hojjā?
goyamā! mūlaguṇapaḍisevae vā hojjā, uttaraguṇapaḍisevae vā hojjā| mūlaguṇe paḍisevamāṇe paṃcaṇhaṃ āsavāṇaṃ annayaraṃ paḍisevejjā, uttaraguṇe paḍisevamāṇe dasavihassa paccakkhāṇassa annayaraṃ paḍisevejjā|
bause ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! paḍisevae hojjā, no apaḍisevae hojjā|
jai paḍisevae hojjā kiṃ mūlaguṇapaḍisevae hojjā? uttaraguṇapaḍisevae hojjā?
goyamā! no mūlaguṇapaḍisevae hojjā, uttaraguṇapaḍisevae hojjā| uttaraguṇe paḍisevamāṇe dasa-vihassa paccakkhāṇassa annayaraṃ paḍisevejjā| paḍisevaṇākusīle jahā pulāe|
kasāyakusīle ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! no paḍisevae hojjā, apaḍisevae hojjā| evaṃ niyaṃṭhe vi| evaṃ siṇāe vi|
"Venerable Sir! Would a pulāka be a transgressor or a non-transgressor?"
"Gautama! He would be a transgressor, not a non-transgressor."
"If he is a transgressor, would he be a transgressor of primary virtues, or a transgressor of secondary virtues?"
"Gautama! He may be a transgressor of primary virtues, or he may be a transgressor of secondary virtues. When transgressing primary virtues, he would transgress any one of the five inflows; when transgressing secondary virtues, he would transgress any one of the ten kinds of renunciation."
"Regarding the bakuśa..."—the question.
"Gautama! He would be a transgressor, not a non-transgressor."
"If he is a transgressor, would he be a transgressor of primary virtues, or a transgressor of secondary virtues?"
"Gautama! He would not be a transgressor of primary virtues; he would be a transgressor of secondary virtues. When transgressing secondary virtues, he would transgress any one of the ten kinds of renunciation. The paḍisevaṇākusīla is as the pulāka."
"Regarding the kasāyakusīla..."—the question.
"Gautama! He would not be a transgressor; he would be a non-transgressor. Likewise also the nirgrantha. Likewise also the snātaka."
Translations (3)
- Viyāhapannatti: Hindi translation (Dīparatnasāgara, 2019) — Hindi
- Viyāhapannatti: Gujarati translation (Dīparatnasāgara, 2020) — Gujarati
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Commentaries (2)
- Bhagavatīvṛtti — Abhayadeva Sūri, Sanskrit
- Viyāhapannatti: ṭīkānusārī vivecana — Muni Dīparatnasāgara 2000, Gujarati