Viyahapannatti 25.6.905

25.6.905

pulāe ṇaṃ bhaṃte! kiṃ paḍisevae hojjā? apaḍisevae hojjā?
goyamā! paḍisevae hojjā, no apaḍisevae hojjā|
jai paḍisevae hojjā kiṃ mūlaguṇapaḍisevae hojjā? uttaraguṇapaḍisevae hojjā?
goyamā! mūlaguṇapaḍisevae vā hojjā, uttaraguṇapaḍisevae vā hojjā| mūlaguṇe paḍisevamāṇe paṃcaṇhaṃ āsavāṇaṃ annayaraṃ paḍisevejjā, uttaraguṇe paḍisevamāṇe dasavihassa paccakkhāṇassa annayaraṃ paḍisevejjā|
bause ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! paḍisevae hojjā, no apaḍisevae hojjā|
jai paḍisevae hojjā kiṃ mūlaguṇapaḍisevae hojjā? uttaraguṇapaḍisevae hojjā?
goyamā! no mūlaguṇapaḍisevae hojjā, uttaraguṇapaḍisevae hojjā| uttaraguṇe paḍisevamāṇe dasa-vihassa paccakkhāṇassa annayaraṃ paḍisevejjā| paḍisevaṇākusīle jahā pulāe|
kasāyakusīle ṇaṃ–pucchā|
goyamā! no paḍisevae hojjā, apaḍisevae hojjā| evaṃ niyaṃṭhe vi| evaṃ siṇāe vi|

"Venerable Sir! Would a pulāka be a transgressor or a non-transgressor?"
"Gautama! He would be a transgressor, not a non-transgressor."
"If he is a transgressor, would he be a transgressor of primary virtues, or a transgressor of secondary virtues?"
"Gautama! He may be a transgressor of primary virtues, or he may be a transgressor of secondary virtues. When transgressing primary virtues, he would transgress any one of the five inflows; when transgressing secondary virtues, he would transgress any one of the ten kinds of renunciation."
"Regarding the bakuśa..."—the question.
"Gautama! He would be a transgressor, not a non-transgressor."
"If he is a transgressor, would he be a transgressor of primary virtues, or a transgressor of secondary virtues?"
"Gautama! He would not be a transgressor of primary virtues; he would be a transgressor of secondary virtues. When transgressing secondary virtues, he would transgress any one of the ten kinds of renunciation. The paḍisevaṇākusīla is as the pulāka."
"Regarding the kasāyakusīla..."—the question.
"Gautama! He would not be a transgressor; he would be a non-transgressor. Likewise also the nirgrantha. Likewise also the snātaka."