Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa ("of a hundred paths") 1.5

Śatapathabrāhmaṇa 1.5

Language
Sanskrit

Contents

1.5.1.1

sa vai pravarāyāśrāvayati | tadyatpravarāyāśrāvayati yajño vā āśrāvaṇaṃ yajñamabhivyāhṛtyātha hotāram pravṛṇā iti tasmātpravarāyāśrāvayati

He (the Adhvaryu) now utters his call for the Pravara (choosing of the Hotri). The reason why he utters his call, is that the (Adhvaryu's) call is the sacrifice: 'having bespoke the sacrifice, I will choose the Hotri,' thus (he thinks, and) for this reason he utters his call for the Pravara.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.2

sa idhmasaṃnahanānyevābhipadyāśrāvayati | sa yadvānārabhy a yajñamadhvaryurāśrāvayedvepano vā ha syādanyāṃ vārttimārcet

He utters his call after taking the fuel-band; for if the Adhvaryu were to utter his call without taking hold of the sacrifice, he would either be unsteady or meet with some other ailment.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.3

taddhaike | vede stīrṇāyai barhirabhipadyāśrāvayantīdhmasya vā śakalamapacidyābhipadyāśrāvayantīdaṃ vai kiṃcidyajñasyedaṃ yajñamabhipadyāśrāvayāma iti vadantastadu tathā na kuryādetadvai kiṃcidyajñasya yairidhmaḥ saṃnaddho bhavatyagniṃ sammṛjanti tadveva khalu yajñamabhipadyāśrāvayati tasmādidhmasaṃnahanānyevābhipadyāśrāvayet

Here now some utter the call after taking sacrificial grass (barhis) from the covered altar, or they utter the call after cutting off and taking a chip of fire-wood, arguing, 'this, surely, is something belonging to the sacrifice; after taking hold of this, the sacrifice, we will utter the call.' Let him, however, not do this; for that also wherewith the firewood was tied together and wherewith they sweep the fire is, doubtless, something belonging to the sacrifice; and thus indeed he utters his call after taking hold of the sacrifice: for this reason let him utter the call after taking the fuel-band.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.4

sa āśrāvya | ya eva devānāṃ hotā tamevāgre pravṛṇite 'gnimeva tadagnaye caivaitaddevebhyaśca nihnute yadahāgre 'gnim pravṛṇīte tadagnaye nihnute 'tha yo devānāṃ hotā tamagre pravṛṇīte tadudevebhyo nihnute

Having uttered the call, he in the first place chooses him who is the Hotri of the gods, that is, Agni. Thereby he propitiates both Agni and the gods: for by first choosing Agni, he propitiates Agni; and by first choosing him who is the Hotri of the gods, he propitiates the gods.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.5

sa āha | agnirdevo daivyo hotetyagnirhi devānāṃ hotā tasmādāhāgnirdevo daivyo hoteti tadagnaye caiva devebhyaśca nihnute yadahāgre 'gnimāha tadagnaye nihnute 'tha yo devānāṃhotā tamagra āha tadu devebhyo nihnute

He says, 'Agni, the god, the divine Hotri--,' for Agni is indeed the Hotri of the gods, therefore he says 'Agni, the god, the divine Hotri:' thereby he propitiates both Agni and the gods; for by his first mentioning Agni he propitiates Agni; and by his first mentioning him who is the Hotri of the gods, he propitiates the gods.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.6

devānyakṣadvidvāṃścikitvāniti | eṣa vai devānanuvidvānyadagniḥ sa enānanuvidvānanuṣṭhyā yakṣadityevaitadāha

'May he worship, knowing the gods, he the thoughtful one,'--for he, Agni, indeed, knows the gods well: hence, he thereby says 'may he who knows them well worship (them) in due form!

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.7

manuṣvadbharatavaditi | manurha vā agre yajñeneje tadanukṛtyemāḥ prajā yajante tasmādāha manuṣvaditi manoryajña ityu vā āhustasmādvevāha manuṣvaditi

'Like as Manu (did), like as Bharata;'--Manu, indeed, worshipped with sacrifice in olden times, and doing as he did these descendants of his now sacrifice: therefore he says 'like as Manu.' Or, say they, (it means) 'at the sacrifice of Manu,' and therefore he says 'as (he did) with Manu.'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.8

bharatavaditi | eṣa hi devebhyo havyam bharati tasmādbharato 'gnirityāhureṣa u vā imāḥ prajāḥ prāṇo bhūtvā bibharti tasmādvevāha bharatavaditi

'Like as (with) Bharata,'--for, say they, he bears (bhar) the oblation to the gods, hence Bharata (the bearer) is Agni; or, say they, he, having become the breath, supports (bhar) these creatures, and therefore he says 'like as Bharata.'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.9

athārṣeyam pravṛṇīte | ṛṣibhyaścaivainametaddevebhyaśca nivedayatyayam mahāvīryo yo yajñam prāpaditi tasmādārṣeyam pravṛṇīte

He then chooses (Agni as) the ancestral (Hotri). He thus introduces him both to the (ancestral) rishis and to the gods (as if he were saying), 'he is of mighty strength who obtained the sacrifice!' for this reason he chooses (him as) the ancestral one.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.10

parastādarvākpravṛṇīte | parastāddhyarvācyaḥ prajāḥ prajāyante jyāyasaspataya u caivaitannihnuta idaṃ hi pitaivāgre 'tha putro 'tha pautrastasmātparastādarvākpravṛṇite

He chooses from the remote end (of the sacrificer's ancestral line) downwards; for it is from the remote end downwards that a race is propagated. Thereby he also propitiates the lord of seniority; for here among men the father comes first, then the son, and then the grandson: this is the reason why he chooses from the remote end downwards.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.11

sa ārṣeyamuktvāha | brahmaṇvaditi brahma hyagnistasmādāha brahmaṇvadityā ca vakṣaditi tadyā evaitaddevatā āvoḍhavā āha tā evaitadāhā ca vakṣaditi 1.5.1[.1]2 brāhmaṇā asya yajñasya prāvitāra iti | ete vai brāhmaṇā yajñasyaprāvitāro ye 'nūcānā ete hyenaṃ tanvata eta enaṃ janayanti tadu tebhyo nihnute tasmādāha brāhmaṇā asya yajñasya prāvitāra iti

Having named the ancestral, he says, 'Like as, Brahman;'--for Agni is the Brahman (the Veda, or the sacerdotium), and therefore he says 'like as Brahman;'--'may he bring (the gods) hither!' what deities he bids him bring hither, those he refers to in saying 'may he bring (them) hither.'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.13

asau mānuṣa iti | tadimam mānuṣaṃ hotāraṃ pravṛṇīte hotā haiṣa purāthaitarhi hotā

'N.N. is the man,' thereby he chooses this man for his Hotri; heretofore he was not a Hotri, but now he is a Hotri.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.14

sa pravṛto hotā | japati devatā upadhāvati yathānuṣṭhyā devebhyo vaṣaṭkuryādyathānuṣṭhyā devebhyo havyaṃ vahedyathā na hvaledevaṃ devatā upadhāvati

The chosen Hotri mutters,--has recourse to the deities: in order that he may give the vashat-call to the gods in its proper order, that he may convey the oblation to the gods in its proper order, that he may not stumble, he has thus recourse to the deities.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.15

tatra japati etatattvā deva savitarvṛṇata iti tatsavitāram prasavāyopadhāvati sa hi devānām prasavitāgniṃ hotrāyeti tadagnaye caivaitaddevebhyaśca nihnute yadahāgre 'gnimāha tadagnaye nihnute 'tha yo devānāṃ hotā tamagra āha tadu devebhyo nihnute

He mutters on this occasion, 'Thee, O divine Savitri, they now choose,'--thereby he has recourse to Savitri for his impulsion (prasava), for Savitri is the impeller (prasavitri) of the gods;--'(thee who art) Agni, for the Hotriship,' thereby he propitiates both Agni and the gods; for by first naming Agni, he propitiates Agni; and by first naming him who is the Hotri of the gods, he propitiates the gods.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.16

saha pitrā vaiśvānareṇeti | sam\vatsaro vai pitā vaiśvānaraḥ prajāpatistatsaṃvatsarāyaivaitatprajāpataye nihnute 'gne pūṣanbṛhaspate pra ca vada pra ca yajetyanuvakṣyanvā etadyakṣyanbhavati tadaitābhya evaitaddevatābhyo nihnute yūyamanubrūta yūyaṃ yajateti

'Together with father Vaisvânara,'--for the father Vaisvânara ('common to all men'), doubtless, is the year, is Pragâpati (lord of creatures); hence he thereby propitiates the year and thus Pragâpati.--'O Agni! O Pûshan! O Brihaspati! speak forth and offer up sacrifice (pra-yag)!'--he (the Hotri), namely, will have to recite the anuvâkyâs and the yâgyâs; he therefore now propitiates those gods: do ye recite, 'do ye offer!' thus (he thereby says).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.17

vasūnāṃ rātau syāma | rudrāṇāmurvyāyāṃ svādityā aditaye syāmānehasa ityete vai trayā devā yadvasavo rudrā ādityā eteṣāmabhiguptau syāmetyevaitadāha 1.5.1[.1]8 juṣṭāmadya devebhyo vācamudyāsamiti | juṣṭamadya devebhyo 'nūcyāsamityevaitadāha taddhi samṛddhaṃ yo juṣṭaṃ devebhyo 'nubravat

'May we partake of the bounty of the Vasus, of the wide sway of the Rudras! may we be beloved of the Âdityas for the sake of (aditi) security from injury, free from obstruction!'--these, to wit, the Vasus, Rudras, and Âdityas, namely, are three (classes of) gods: 'may we enjoy their protection' he thereby says.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.19

juṣṭām brahmabhya iti | juṣṭamadya brāhmaṇebhyo 'nūcyāsamityevaitadāha taddhi samṛddham yo juṣṭam brāhmaṇebhyo 'nubravat

'Agreeable to the Brahmans,'--by this he means to say 'may I this day recite what is agreeable to the Brâhmanas (priests);' for auspicious it is when one recites what is agreeable to the Brâhmanas.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.20

juṣṭāṃ narāśaṃsāyeti | prajā vai narastatsarvābhyaḥ prajābhya āha taddhi samṛddhaṃ yaśca veda yaśca na sādhvanvavocatsādhvanvavocadityeva visṛjyante yadadya hotṛvarye jihmaṃcakṣuḥ parāpatat agniṣṭatpunarābhriyājjātavedā vicarṣaṇiriti yathā yānagre 'gnīnhotrāya prāvṛṇata te prādhanvannevaṃ yanme 'tra pravareṇāmāyi tanme punarāpyāyayetyevaitadāha tatho hāsyaitatpunarāpyāyate

'Agreeable to Narâsamsa,'--man (nara), namely, is a creature: hence he says this for all the creatures; thereby it is auspicious, and whether or not he knows (forms of speech that are agreeable), they are uttered (and received with applause), 'well he has recited! well he has recited!'--'What at the Hotri choice may escape the crooked eye this day, that may Agni bring back here, he, the knower of beings (gâtavedas), the nimble one (vikarshani)!'--by this he means to say, 'even as those (three) Agnis, whom they first chose for the Hotriship, passed away, (but thou, the fourth Agni, wast then obtained,) so do thou make good for me whatever mistake may have been committed at my election!' and it is accordingly made good for him.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.21

athādhvaryuṃ cāgnīdhaṃ ca sammṛśati | mano vā adhvaryurvāgghotā tanmanaścaivaitadvācaṃ ca saṃdadhāti

He now touches the Adhvaryu and the Âgnîdhra: for the Adhvaryu is the mind, and the Hotri is, speech: thus he thereby brings mind and speech together.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.22

tatra japati | ṣaṇmorvīraṃhasaspāntvagniśca pṛthivī cāpaśca vājaścāhaśca rātriścetyetā mā devatā ārttergopāyantvityevaitadāha tasyo hi na hvalāsti yametā devatā ārttergopāyeyuḥ

At the same time he mutters, 'From anguish may the six spaces protect me, fire, earth, water, wind, day, and night!'--'may these deities protect me from disease!' thus he thereby says; for he whom these deities protect from disease, will not stumble (or fail).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.23

atha hotṛṣadanamupāvartate | sa hotṛṣadanādekaṃ tṛṇaṃ nirasyati nirastaḥ parāvasuriti purāvasurha vai nāmāsurāṇāṃ hotā sa tamevaitaddhotṛṣadanānnirasyati

He steps beside the Hotri's seat, takes one stalk of (reed) grass from the Hotri's seat and casts it outside (the sacrificial ground), with the formula, 'Ejected is the wealth-clutcher (parâvasu, lit. "off-wealth")!' Formerly, namely, the Hotri of the Asuras was one Parâvasu by name: him he thereby ejects from the Hotri's seat.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.24

atha hotṛṣadana upaviśati | idamahamarvāvasoḥ sadane sīdāmītyarvāvasurvai nāma devānāṃ hotā tasyaivaitatsadane sīdati

He then sits down on the Hotri's seat, with the formula, 'I here sit down on the seat of the wealth-bestower (arvâvasu, lit. "hither-wealth")!' for one Arvâvasu by name was the Hotri of the gods, and on his seat he accordingly sits down.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.25

tatra japati viśvakarmastanūpā asi mā mo doṣiṣṭam mā mā hiṃsiṣṭameṣa vāṃ loka ityudaṅṅejatyantarā vā etadāhavaniyaṃ ca gārhapatyaṃ cāste tadu tābhyāṃ nihnute mā mo doṣiṣṭam mā mā hiṃsiṣṭamiti tathā hainametau na hiṃstaḥ

At the same time he mutters, 'O All-maker, thou art the protector of lives! do not ye two (fires) scorch me away (from this), injure me not! this is your sphere;' with this he moves slightly northwards: by this (mantra, he indicates that) he sits midway between the Âhavanîya and the Gârhapatya, and thus he propitiates these two; and in accordance with what he says, 'do not scorch me away from this! injure me not!' they do not injure him.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.1.26

athāgnimīkṣamāṇo japati | viśve devāḥ śāstana mā yatheha hotā vṛto manavai yanniṣadya pra me brūta bhāgadheyaṃ yathā vo yena pathā havyamā vo vahānīti yathā yebhyaḥ pakvaṃ syāttānbrūyādvanu mā śāsta yathā va āhariṣyāmi yathā vaḥ parivekṣyāmītyevamevaitaddeveṣu praśāsanamicate 'nu mā śāsta yathā vo 'nuṣṭhyā vaṣaṭkuryāmanuṣṭyā havyaṃ vaheyamiti tasmādevaṃ japati

He then mutters whilst looking at the (Âhavanîya) fire, 'All ye gods, instruct me, how and what I am to mind while seated here as the chosen Hotri! declare my share (of the sacrificial duties), how and by what road I am to convey the oblation to you!'--for as one says to those for whom food has been cooked, 'order me how I am to bring if you, how I am to serve it up for you!' in like manner he is desirous of directions regarding the gods, and for this reason he mutters thus, 'instruct me how I may utter the Vashat-call for you in its proper order, how I may bring you the oblation in its proper order!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.1

agnirhotā vettvagnerhotramiti agniridaṃ hotā vettvityevaitadāhāgnerhotramiti tasyo hi hotraṃ vettu prāvitramiti yajño vai prāvitraṃ vettu yajñamityevaitadāha sādhu te yajamāna devateti sādhu te yajamāna devatā yasya te 'gnirhotetyevaitadāha ghṛtavatīmadhvaryo srucamāsyasveti tadadhvaryu prasauti sa yadekāmivāha

[The Hotri continues], 'May Agni, the priest (hotri), know (undertake) Agni's priestly duty (hautram),'--thereby he says 'may Agni, as Hotri, know this!' 'Agni's priestly duty' he says, because it is his duty that he must know;--'that means of salvation,'--the means of salvation, assuredly, is the sacrifice: 'may he know the sacrifice' is what he thereby says.--'Favourable to thee, O Sacrificer, is the deity!' by this he says 'favourable is the deity to thee, O Sacrificer, whose Hotri is Agni!'--'Take up the spoon, O Adhvaryu, full of butter!' thereby he urges on the Adhvaryu. The reason why he mentions one (spoon) only (is this).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.2

yajamāna eva juhūmanu | yo smā arātīyati sa upabhṛtamanu sa yaddve iva brūyādyajamānāya dviṣantam bhrātṛvyam pratyudyāminaṃ kuryādattaiva juhūmanvādya upabhṛtamanu sa yaddve iva brūyādattra ādyam pratyudyāminaṃ kuryāttasmādekāmivaivāha

The Sacrificer, doubtless, stands behind the guhû, and he, who means evil to him, stands behind the upabhrit; and if he were to speak of two (spoons), he would cause the spiteful enemy to countervail the Sacrificer. Behind the guhû stands the eater, and behind the upabhrit the one to be eaten; and if he were to speak of two (spoons), he would make the one to be eaten countervail the eater. For these reasons he speaks of one (spoon) only.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.3

devayuvaṃ viśvavārāmiti | upastautyevaināmetanmahayatyeva yadāha devayuvaṃ viśvavārāmitīḍāmahai devāṃ īḍenyānnamasyāma namasyānyajāma yajñiyānitīḍāmahai tāndevānya īḍenyā namasyāma tānye namasyā yajāma yajñiyāniti manuṣyā vā īḍenyāḥ pitaro namasyā devā yajñiyāḥ

[He continues],'--(the spoon which is) devoted to the gods, possessed of all boons,' he praises, he magnifies it when he says 'devoted to the gods, possessed of all boons.'--'Let us praise the gods, the praiseworthy! let us adore the adorable! let us worship the worshipful!' that is, 'let us praise those gods who are praiseworthy! let us adore those who are adorable! let us worship those who are worthy of worship!' the praiseworthy, to wit, are the men, the adorable the fathers, and the worshipful the gods.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.4

yā vai prajā yajñe 'nanvābhaktāḥ | parābhūtā vai tā evamevaitadyā imāḥ prajā aparābhūtatstā yajña ābhajati manuṣyānanu paśavo devānanu vayāṃsyoṣadhayo vanaspatayo yadidaṃ kiñcaivamu tatsarvaṃ yajña ābhaktam

For, indeed, the creatures that are not allowed to take part in the sacrifice are forlorn; and therefore he makes those creatures here on earth that are not forlorn, take part in the sacrifice: behind the men are the beasts, and behind the gods are the birds, the plants, and the trees; and thus all that here exists is made to take part in the sacrifice.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.5

tā vā etāḥ | nava vyāhṛtayo bhavanti naveme puruṣe prāṇā etānevāsminnetaddadhāti tasmānnava vyāhṛtayo bhavanti

These same (preceding formulas) are nine utterances; for nine, in number, are those breaths (or vital airs) in man, and these he thereby puts into him (the sacrificer): for this reason there are nine utterances.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.6

yajño ha devebhyo 'pacakrāma | taṃ devā anvamantrayantā naḥśṛṇūpa na āvartasveti so 'stu tathetyeva devānupāvavarta tenopāvṛttena devā ayajanta teneṣṭvaitadabhavanyadidaṃ devāḥ

The sacrifice fled away from the gods. The gods called out after it, 'Listen (a-sru) to us! come back to us!' It replied, 'So be it!' and returned to the gods; and with what had thus returned to them, the gods worshipped; and by worshipping with it they became the gods they now are.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.7

sa yadāśrāvayati | yajñamevaitadanumantrayata ā naḥ śṛnūpa na āvartasvetyatha yatpratyāśrāvayati yajña evaitadupāvartate 'stu tatheti tenopāvṛttena retasā bhūtenartvijaḥ sampradāyaṃ caranti yajamānena paro 'kṣṃ yathā pūrṇapātreṇa sampradāyaṃ careyurevamanenartvijaḥ sampradāyaṃ caranti tadvācaivaitatsampradāyaṃ caranti vāgghi yajño vāgu hi retastadetenaivaitatsampradāyaṃ caranti

Now when he (the Adhvaryu) calls (on the Âgnîdhra), he thereby calls after the sacrifice, 'Listen to us! come back to us!' and when he (the Âgnîdhra) responds, then the sacrifice comes back, saying 'so be it!' and with it, thus passing over to them, as with seed, the priests carry on the tradition, imperceptibly to the sacrificer; for even as people hand on from one to the other a full vessel, in the same way they (the priests) hand down that (sacrifice) from one to the other. They hand it down by means of speech, for the sacrifice is speech (prayer), and speech is seed: therefore they keep up the tradition by means of it.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.8

so 'nubrūhītyevoktvādhvaryuḥ | nāpavyāharenno eva hotāpavyāharedāśrāvayatyadhvaryustadagnīdhaṃ yajña upāvartate

After he has said (to the Hotri), 'Recite!' the Adhvaryu must utter nothing improper (worldly); neither must the Hotri utter anything improper. The Adhvaryu utters his call: thereby the sacrifice passes on to the Âgnîdhra.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.9

so 'gninnāpavyāharet | ā pratyāśrāvaṇātpratyāśrāvayatyagnīttatpunaradhvaryuṃ yajña upāvartate

The Âgnîdhra must utter nothing improper until his response. The Âgnîdhra responds: thereby the sacrifice passes back to the Adhvaryu.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.10

so 'dhvaryurnāpavyāharet | ā yajeti vaktoryajetyevādhvaryurhotre yajñaṃ samprayacati

The Adhvaryu must utter nothing improper until he pronounces (the word) 'yaga (recite the offering-prayer):' in saying 'yaga' the Adhvaryu hands the sacrifice on to the Hotri.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.11

sa hotā nāpavyāharet | ā vaṣaṭkārāttaṃ vaṣaṭkāreṇāgnāveva yonau reto bhūtaṃ siñcatyagnirvai yoniryajñasya sa tataḥ prajāyata iti nu haviryajñe 'tha saumye 'dhvare

The Hotri must utter nothing improper until his vashat-call. By the vashat-call he pours it (the sacrifice) into the fire, as seed into the womb; for the fire is indeed the womb of the sacrifice, from thence it is brought forth. So now at the havis-sacrifice. And at the Soma-cult,--

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.12

sa vai grahaṃ gṛhītvādhvaryuḥ | nāpavyāharedopākaraṇādupāvartadhvamityevādhvaryurudgātṛbhyo yajñaṃ samprayacati

When he has drawn (the Soma), the Adhvaryu must not utter anything improper until his summons (for the chanting of the stotra): with the call 'draw near!' the Adhvaryu hands the sacrifice on to the Udgâtris (chanters).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.13

ta udgātāro nāpavyāhareyuḥ | ottamāyā eṣottametyevodgātāro hotre yajñaṃ samprayacanti

The Udgâtris must not utter anything improper until the last (stotra-verse): 'this is the last one,' thus thinking, the Udgâtris hand on the sacrifice to the Hotri.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.14

sa hotā nāpavyāharet | ā vaṣaṭkārāttaṃ vaṣaṭkāreṇāgnāveva yonau reto bhūtaṃ siñcatyagnirvai yoniryajñasya sa tataḥ prajāyate

The Hotri must utter nothing improper until the vashat-call. With the vashat-call he pours it (the sacrifice) into the fire, as seed into the womb; for the fire is indeed the womb of the sacrifice, since from thence it is brought forth.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.15

sa yaddha so 'pavyāharet | yaṃ yajña upāvartate yathā pūrṇapātram parāsiñcedevaṃ ha sa yajamānam parāsiñcetsa yatra haivamṛtvijaḥ saṃvidānā yajñena caranti sarvameva tatra kalpate na muhyati tasmādevameva yajño bhartavyaḥ

If he whom the sacrifice approaches were to utter anything improper, he would waste the sacrifice, even as he might waste (water by spilling from) a full vessel. And where the officiating priests thus practice sacrifice with a perfect mutual understanding between them, there everything works regularly and no hitch occurs: therefore it is in this way that the sacrifice must be nursed.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.16

tā vā etāḥ | pañca vyāhṛtayo bhavantyo śrāvayāstu śrauṣaḍyaja ye yajāmahe vauṣaḍiti pāṅkto yajñaḥ pāṅktaḥpaśuḥ pañcartavaḥ saṃvatsarasyaiṣaikā yajñasya mātraiṣā sampat

Now there are here five utterances, viz. (1) 'Bid (him, Agni, or them) hear!' (2) 'Yea, may he (or, one) hear!' (3) 'Pronounce the prayer to the kindling-sticks!' (4) 'We who pronounce the prayer...' (5) 'May he bear (the sacrifice to the gods)!' fivefold is the sacrifice, fivefold the animal victim, five are the seasons of the year: this is the one measure of the sacrifice, this its consummation.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.17

tāsāṃ saptadaśākṣarāṇi | saptadaśo vai prajāpatiḥ prajāpatiryajña eṣaikā yajñasya mātraiṣā sampat

These (five formulas) consist of seventeen syllables;--seventeenfold, indeed, is Pragâpati, and Pragâpati is the sacrifice: this is the one measure of the sacrifice, this its consummation.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.18

o śrāvayeti vai devāḥ | purovātaṃ sasṛjire 'stu śrauṣaḍityabhrāṇi samaplāvayanyajeti vidyutaṃ ye yajāmaha iti stanayitnuṃ vaṣaṭkāreṇaiva prāvarṣayan

With 'O srâvaya!' the gods sent forth the east wind; with 'Astu sraushat!' they caused the clouds to flow together; with 'Yaga (pronounce the yâgyâ)!' (they sent forth) the lightning; with' Ye yagâmahe (we who pray),' the thunder; with the vashat-call they caused it to rain.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.19

sa yadi vṛṣṭikāmaḥ syāt | yadīṣṭyā vā yajeta darśapūrṇamāsayorvaiva brūyādvṛṣṭikāmo vā asmīti tatro adhvaryuṃ brūyātpurovātaṃ ca vidyutaṃ ca manasā dhyāyetyabhrāṇi manasā dhyāyetyagnīdhaṃ stanayitnuṃ ca varṣaṃ ca manasā dhyāyeti hotāraṃ sarvāṇyetāni manasā dhyāyeti brahmāṇaṃ varṣati haiva tatra yatraivamṛtvijaḥ saṃvidānā yajñena caranti

Should he (the sacrificer) be desirous of rain, or should he perform a special offering, or even at the new- and full-moon sacrifice itself, he may say, 'Verily, I am desirous of rain!'--and he may also say to the Adhvaryu, 'Ponder thou in thy mind the east wind and the lightning!'--to the Âgnîdhra, 'Ponder thou the clouds in thy mind!'--to the Hotri, 'Ponder thou in thy mind the thunder and rain!'--to the Brahman, 'Ponder thou all, these in thy mind!'--for where the officiating priests thus practice sacrifice with a perfect mutual understanding between them, there it will indeed rain.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.2.20

o śrāvayeti vai devāḥ | virājamabhyājuhuvurastu śrauṣaḍiti vatsamupāvāsṛjanyajetyudajayanye yajāmaha ityupāsīdanvaṣaṭkāreṇaiva virājamaduhateyaṃ vai virāḍasyai vā eṣa doha evaṃ ha vā asmā iyaṃ virāṭsarvāṅkāmānduhe ya evametaṃ virājo dohaṃ veda

With 'O srâvaya!' the gods called the shining one (virâg, viz. cow), with 'Astu sraushat!' they untied the calf and let it go to her; with 'Yaga!' they raised (its head to the udder of the cow); with 'Ye yagâmahe!' they sat down by her (for milking); with the vashat-call they milked her. The shining one, doubtless, is this (earth), and of her this is the milking: and for him who knows this to be the milking of the shining one, this shining (earth-cow) thus milks out all his desires.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.1

ṛtavo ha vai prayājāḥ | tasmātpañca bhavanti pañca hyṛtavaḥ

The fore-offerings (prayâga), assuredly, are the seasons: hence there are five of them, for there are five seasons.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.2

devāśca vā asurāśca | ubhaye prājāpatyāḥ paspṛdhira etasminyajñe prajāpatau pitari saṃvatsare 'smākamayaṃ bhaviṣyatyasmākamayam bhaviṣyatīti

The gods and the Asuras, both of them sprang from Pragâpati, were once contending for this sacrifice, (which is) their father Pragâpati, the year: 'Ours it (he) shall be!' 'Ours it (he) shall be!' they said.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.3

tato devāḥ | arcantaḥ śrāmyantaścerurasta etānprayājāndadṛśustairayajanta tairṛtūntsaṃvatsaram prājayannṛtubhyaḥ saṃvatsarātsapatnānantarāyaṃstasmātprajayāḥ prajayā ha vai nāmaitadyatprayājā iti tatho evaiṣa etairṛtūntsaṃvatsaram prayajatyṛtubhyaḥ saṃvatsarātsapatnānantareti tasmātprayājairyajate

Then the gods went on praising and toiling. They saw these fore-offerings and worshipped with them. By means of them they gained (pra-gi) the seasons, the year; they deprived their rivals of the seasons, of the year: hence (the fore-offerings are) victories (pragaya), for, assuredly, pragaya is the very same term as prayâga (fore-offering). And in the same way this one (the sacrificer) wins by means of them the seasons, the year; deprives his rivals of the seasons, of the year. This is the reason why he performs the fore-offerings.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.4

te vā ājyahaviṣo bhavanti | vajro vā ājyametena vai devā vajreṇājyenartūntsaṃvatsaram prājayannṛtubhyaḥ saṃvatsarātsapatnānantarāyaṃstatho evaiṣa etena vajreṇājyenartūntsaṃvatsaram prajayatyṛtubhyaḥ saṃvatsarātsapatnānantareti tasmādājyahaviṣo bhavanti

The sacrificial food at these offerings consists of clarified butter. Now the butter, indeed, is a thunderbolt, and with that thunderbolt, the butter, the gods gained the seasons, the year, and deprived their rivals of the seasons, of the year. And with that thunderbolt, the butter, he now, in the same way, gains the seasons, the year, and deprives his enemies of the seasons, of the year. For this reason clarified butter forms the sacrificial food at these (offerings).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.5

etadvai saṃvatsarasya svam payaḥ | yadājyaṃ tatsvenaivainametatpayasā devāḥ svyakurvata tatho evainameṣa etatsvenaiva payasā svīkurute tasmādājyahaviṣo bhavanti

Now this butter is the year's own liquor: hence the gods gained it (the year) by means of its own liquor; and in the same way he also now gains it by means of its own liquor. This is the reason why clarified butter forms the sacrificial food at these (fore-offerings).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.6

sa yatraiva tiṣṭhanprayājebhya āśrāvayet | tata eva nāpakrāmetsaṃgrāmo vā eṣa saṃnidhīyate yaḥ prayājairyajate yataro vai saṃyattayoḥ parājayate 'pa vai saṃkrāmatyabhitarāmu vai jayaṅkrāmati tasmādabhitarāmabhitarāmeva krāmedabhitarāmabhitarāmāhutīrjuhuyāt

Let him (the Adhvaryu) not move from that same spot where he may be standing when he calls for the fore-offerings. A battle, it is true, is witnessed whenever any one performs the fore-offerings, and whichever of the two combatants is worsted, that one, no doubt, retreats; and he who obtains the victory, advances still nearer: he (the Adhvaryu) might therefore (feel inclined to) step nearer and nearer (to the fire), and offer the oblations (while moving) nearer and nearer.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.7

tadu tathā na kuryāt | yatraiva tiṣṭhanprayājebhya āśrāvayettata eva nāpakrāmedyatro eva samiddhatamam manyeta tadāhutīrjuhuyātsamiddhahomena hyeva samṛddhā āhutayaḥ

This, however, he should not do; he should not move from that same spot where he may be standing when he calls for the fore-offerings. Let him rather offer the (five) oblations in that part (of the fire) where he thinks there is the fiercest blaze; for only by being offered in blazing (fire), oblations are successful.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.8

sa āśrāvyāha | samidho yajeti tadvasantaṃ saminddhe sa vasantaḥ samiddho 'nyānṛtūntsaminddha ṛtavaḥ samiddhāḥ prajāśca prajanāyantyoṣadhīśca pacanti tadveva khalu sarvānṛtūnnirāhātha yajayajetyevottarānāhājāmitāyai jāmi ha kuryādyattanūnapātaṃ yajeḍo yajeti brūyāttasmādyajayajetyevottarānāha

He (the Adhvaryu), having called (on, and having been responded to by, the Âgnîdhra), says (to the Hotri), 'Pronounce the offering-prayer (yâgyâ) to the Samidhs (kindling-sticks)!' Thereby he kindles the spring; the spring, when kindled, kindles the other seasons; the seasons, when kindled, generate the creatures and ripen the plants. In the same (formula) he also implies the (four) remaining seasons, and in order to avoid sameness, he introduces the others by merely saying each time, 'Pronounce the offering-prayer!' For were he to say, 'Pronounce the offering-prayer to Tanûnapât!' 'Pronounce the offering-prayer to the Ids!' and so on, he would commit (the fault of) repetition: hence he introduces the remaining (seasons or fore-offerings) by merely saying each time, 'Pronounce the offering-prayer!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.9

sa vai samidho yajati | vasanto vai samidvasantameva taddevā avṛñjata vasantātsapatnānantarāyanvasantamevaiṣa etadvṛṅkte vasantātsapatnānantareti tasmātsamidho yajati

He (the Hotri) now pronounces the offering-prayer (yâgyâ) to the Samidhs. The samidh (kindler), doubtless, is the spring. The gods, at that time, appropriated the spring, and deprived their rivals of the spring; and now this one (the sacrificer) also appropriates the spring, and deprives his rivals of the spring: this is the reason why he pronounces the offering-prayer to the Samidhs.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.10

atha tanūnapātaṃ yajati | grīṣmo vai tanūnapādgrīṣmo hyāsām prajānāṃ tanūstapati grīṣmameva taddevā avṛñjata grīṣmātsapatnānantarāyaṅgrīṣmamevaiṣa etadvṛṅkte grīṣmātsapatnānantareti tasmāttanūnapātaṃ yajati

After that he pronounces the offering-prayer to Tanûnapât. Tanûnapât, doubtless, is the summer; for the summer burns the bodies (tanûn tapati) of these creatures. The gods, at that time, appropriated the summer, and deprived their rivals of the summer; and now this one also appropriates the summer, and deprives his rivals of the summer: this is the reason why he pronounces the offering-prayer to Tanûnapât.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.11

atheḍo yajati | varṣā vā iḍa iti hi varṣā iḍo yadidaṃ kṣudraṃ sarīsṛpaṃ grīṣmahemantābhyāṃ nityaktam bhavati tadvarṣā īḍitamivānnamicamānaṃ carati tasmādvarṣā iḍo varṣā eva taddevā avṛñjata varṣābhyaḥ sapatnānantarāyanvarṣā u evaiṣa etadvṛṅkte varṣābhyaḥ sapatnānantareti tasmādiḍo yajati

He then pronounces the offering-prayer to the Ids. The Ids (praises), doubtless, are the rains; they are the rains, inasmuch as the vile, crawling (vermin) which shrink during the summer and winter, then (in the rainy season) move about in quest of food, as it were, praising (îd) the rains: therefore the Ids are the rains. The gods, at that time, appropriated the rains, and deprived their rivals of the rains; and now this one also appropriates the rains, and deprives his rivals of the rains: this is the reason why he pronounces the offering-prayer to the Ids.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.12

atha barhiryajati | śaradvai barhiriti hi śaradbarhiryā imāoṣadhayo grīṣmahemantābhyāṃ nityaktā bhavanti tā varṣā vardhante tāḥ śaradi barhiṣo rūpaṃ prastīrṇāḥ śere ta!smācaradbarhiḥ śaradameva taddevā avṛñjata śaradaḥ sapatnāntarāyaṃcaradamevaiṣa etadvṛṅkte śaradaḥ sapatnānantareti tasmādbarhiryajati

He then pronounces the offering-prayer to the Barhis (covering of sacrificial grass on the altar). The barhis, doubtless, is the autumn; the barhis is the autumn, inasmuch as these plants which shrink during the summer and winter grow by the rains, and in autumn lie spread open after the fashion of barhis: for this reason the barhis is the autumn. The gods, at that time, appropriated the autumn, and deprived their rivals of the autumn; and now this one also appropriates the autumn, and deprives his rivals of the autumn: this is why he pronounces the prayer to the barhis.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.13

atha svāhāsvāheti yajati | anto vai yajñasya svāhākāro 'nta ṛtūnāṃ hemanto vasantāddhi parārddhyo 'ntenaiva tadantaṃ devā avṛñjatāntenāntātsapatnānantarāyannanteno evaiṣa etadantaṃ vṛṅkte 'ntenāntātsapatnānantareti tasmātsvāheti yajati

He then pronounces the offering-prayer with 'Svâhâ! Svâhâ!' The Svâhâ-call, namely, marks the end of the sacrifice, and the end of the year is the winter, since the winter is on the other (remoter) side of the spring. By the end (of the sacrifice) the gods, at that time, appropriated the end (of the year); by the end they deprived their rivals of the end; and by the end this one also now appropriates the end; by the end he deprives his rivals of the end: this is why he pronounces the offering-prayers with 'Svâhâ! Svâhâ!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.14

tadvā etat | vasanta eva hemantātpunarasuretasmāddhyeṣa punrbhavati punarha vā asmiṃloke bhavati ya evametadveda

Now the spring, assuredly, comes into life again out of the winter, for out of the one the other is born again: therefore he who knows this, is indeed born again in this world.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.15

sa vai vyattu vetviti yajati | ajāmitāyai jāmi ha kuryādyadvyantuvyntviti vaiva yajedvetuvettviti vā vyantviti vai yoṣā vetviti vṛṣā mithunamevaitatprajananaṃ kriyate tasmādvyantu vetviti yajati

In order to avoid sameness he prays (alternately) with 'may they accept!' and 'may he (or it) accept!' for he would commit (the fault) of repetition, if he were to pray with 'may they accept!' each time, or with 'may he accept!' each time. By 'may they accept!' doubtless, females (are implied); and by 'may he accept!' a male (is implied): thereby a productive union is effected, and for this reason he prays (alternately) with 'may they accept!' and 'may he (or it) accept!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.16

atha caturthe prayāje samānayati barhiṣi | prajā vai brahīreta ājyaṃ tatprajāsvevaitadretaḥ sicyate tena retasā siktenemāḥ prajāḥ punarabhyāvartam prajāyante tasmāccaturtheprayāje samānayati barhiṣi

Now at the fourth fore-offering, to the barhis, he pours (butter) together (into the guhû). The barhis, namely, represents descendants, and the butter seed: hence seed is thereby infused into the descendants, and by that infused seed descendants are generated again and again. For this reason he pours together (butter) at the fourth fore-offering, that to the barhis.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.17

saṃgrāmo vā eṣa saṃnidhīyate | yaḥ prayājairyajate yataraṃ vai saṃyattayormitramāgacati sa jayati tadetadupabhṛto 'dhi juhūm mitramāgacati tena prajayati tasmāccaturthe prayāje samānayati barhiṣi

Now, a battle, as it were, is going on here when any one performs the fore-offerings; and whichever of the two combatants a friend (an ally) joins, he obtains the victory: hence a friend thereby joins the guhû from out of the upabhrit, and by him it (or he) obtains the victory. This is why he pours together (butter) at the fourth fore-offering, that to the barhis.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.18

yajamāna eva juhūmanu | yo smā arātīyati sa upabhṛtamanuyajamānāyaivaitaddviṣantam bhrātṛvyam baliṃ hārayatyattaiva juhūmanvādya upabhṛtamanvattra evaitadādyam baliṃ hārayati tasmāccaturthe prayāje samānayati

The sacrificer, doubtless, (stands) behind the guhû, and he who means evil to him, (stands) behind the upabhrit: hence he thereby makes the spiteful enemy pay tribute to the sacrificer. The consumer, doubtless, (stands) behind the guhû, and the one to be consumed behind the upabhrit hence he thereby makes the one that is to be consumed pay tribute to the consumer. This is the reason why he pours (butter) together at the fourth fore-offering, that to the barhis.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.19

sa vā anavamṛśantsamānayati | sa yaddhāvamṛṣedyajamānaṃ dviṣatā bhrātṛvyenāvamṛśedattāramādyenāvamṛśettasmādanavamṛśantsamānayati

He pours (the butter) together without (the two spoons) touching (each other). If he were to touch (the one spoon with the other) he would touch the sacrificer with his spiteful enemy, he would touch the consumer with the one to be consumed: for this reason he pours (the butter) together without touching.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.20

athottarāṃ juhūmadhyūhati | yajamānamevaitadviṣati bhrātṛvye 'dhyūhatyattāramādye 'dhyūhati tasmāduttarāṃ juhūmadhyūhati 1.5.3[.2]1 devā ha vā ūcuḥ | hanta vijitamevānu sarvaṃ yajñaṃ saṃsthāpayāma yadi no 'surarakṣasānyāsajeyuḥ saṃsthita eva no yajñaṃ syāditi

He holds the guhû over the upabhrit). Thereby he keeps the sacrificer above his spiteful enemy, he keeps the consumer above the one to be consumed: for this reason he holds the guhû over (the upabhrit).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.22

ta uttame prayāje | svāhākāreṇaiva sarvaṃ yajñaṃ samasthāpayantsvāhāgnimiti tadāgneyamājyabhāgaṃ samasthāpayantsvāhā somamiti tatsaumyamājyabhāgaṃ samasthāpayantsvāhāgnimiti tadya eṣa ubhayatrācyuta āgneyaḥ puroḍāśo bhavati taṃ samasthāpayan

At the last fore-offering they established the entire sacrifice by means of the Svâhâ ('hail!'). With 'Svâhâ Agni!' they established the butter-portion for Agni; with 'Svâhâ Soma!' they established the butter-portion for Soma; and with (the second) 'Svâhâ Agni!' they established that indispensable sacrificial cake which there is on both occasions (i.e. at the new- and full-moon sacrifices).

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.23

atha yathādevataṃ | svāhā devā ājyapā iti tatprayājānuyājāntsamasthāpayanprayājānuyājā vai devā ājyapā juṣāṇo agnirājyasya vetviti tadagniṃ sviṣṭakṛtaṃ samasthāpayannagnirhi sviṣṭakṛtsa eṣo 'vyetarhi tathaiva yajñaṃ saṃtiṣṭate yathaivainaṃ devāḥ samasthāpayaṃstasmāduttame prayāje svāhāsvāheti yajati yāvanti havīṃṣi bhavanti vijitamevaitadanu sarvaṃ yajñaṃ saṃsthāpayati tasmādyadata ūrdhvaṃ viloma yajñe kriyeta na tadādriyeta saṃsthito me yajña iti ha vidyātsa haiṣa yajño yātayāmevāsa yathā vaṣaṭkṛtaṃ hutaṃ svāhākṛtaṃ

And so with the (other) deities respectively. With 'Svâhâ the butter-drinking gods!' they established the fore-offerings and the after-offerings (anuyâgas), for the fore-offerings and after-offerings, doubtless, represent the butter-drinking gods. With the formula 'May Agni graciously accept of the butter!' they established Agni as Svishtakrit ('maker of good offering'), for Agni is indeed the maker of good offering. And till this day that sacrifice stands as firm as the gods established it. This is the reason why at the last fore-offering he prays with Svâhâ! Svâhâ!' according to the number of oblations (there are at the chief sacrifice). After he (the sacrificer) has won his battle, he establishes the entire sacrifice on a firm basis, so that, if after this he should violate the proper order of the sacrifice, he need not heed it; for he will know that his sacrifice is firmly established. Now what with exclaiming 'Vashat,' with offering, and with calling out 'Svâhâ,' this same sacrifice was well-nigh exhausted.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.24

te devā akāmayanta | kathaṃ nvimaṃ yajñam punarāpyāyayemāyātayāmānaṃ kuryāma tenāyātayāmnā pracaremeti

The gods were anxious as to how they might replenish it, how they might again render it efficient and practise (worshipping) with it, when efficient.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.3.25

sa yajjuhvāmājyam pariśiṣṭamāsīt | yena yajñaṃ samasthāpayaṃstenaiva yathāpūrvaṃ havīṃṣyabhyaghārayanpunarevaināni tadāpyāyayannayātayāmānyakurvannayātayāma hyājyaṃ tasmāduttamam prayājamiṣṭvā yathāpūrvaṃ havīṃṣyabhighārayati punarevaināni tadāpyāyayatyayātayāmāni karotyayātayāma hyājyaṃ tasmādyasya kasya ca haviṣo 'vadyati punareva tadabhighārayati sviṣṭakṛta eva tatpunarāpyāyatyayātayāma karotyatha yadā sviṣṭakṛte 'vadyati na tataḥ punarabhighārayati no hi tataḥ kāṃ cana haviṣo 'gnāvāhutiṃ hoṣyanbhavati

Now what was left in the guhû of the butter wherewith they had established the sacrifice, with that they sprinkled the havis (dishes, or kinds, of sacrificial food) one after another, and thereby replenished them and again rendered them efficient, because the butter is indeed efficient. Hence after offering the last fore-offering, he sprinkles the havis one after another, and thereby replenishes them and again renders them efficient, because the butter is indeed efficient. Hence also from whatever sacrificial food he (afterwards at the principal oblations) cuts off (a portion for a deity), that he again sprinkles (with butter), that he replenishes and renders efficient for the (Svishtakrit) maker of good offering. But when he cuts off the portion for the maker of good offering, then he does not again sprinkle (the sacrificial food out of which the portion has been cut), since after that he will not make any other oblation in the fire from the sacrificial food.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.1

sa vai samidho yajati | prāṇā vai samidhaḥ prāṇānevaitatsaminddhe prāṇairhyayam puruṣaḥ samiddhastasmādabhimṛṣeti brūyādyadyupatāpī syātsa yadyuṣṇaḥ syādaiva tāvacaṃseta samiddho hi sa tāvadbhavati yadyu śītaḥ syānnāśaṃseta tatprāṇānevāsminnetaddadhāti tasmātsamidho yajati

He (accordingly) pronounces the offering-prayer to the Samidhs (kindling-sticks). The Samidhs (kindlers), doubtless, are the breaths (vital airs), and he thereby kindles the breaths; for this man (the sacrificer) is kindled (animated) by his breaths: hence if he (the sacrificer) be burning (with fever, &c.), he (the Adhvaryu) will say, 'Stroke (thyself)!' If he be hot, then one may feel confident, for then he is kindled; and if he be cold, then one need hope no longer. Thus he thereby puts the breaths into him: this is the reason why he pronounces the prayer to the Samidhs.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.2

atha tanūnapātaṃ yajati | reto vai tanūnapādreta evaitatsiñcati tasmāttanūnapātaṃ yajati

He then pronounces the offering-prayer to Tanûnapât. Tanûnapât, doubtless, is seed; hence he thereby casts seed: this is why he pronounces the prayer to Tanûnapât.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.3

atheḍo yajati | prajā ghā iḍo yadā vai retaḥ siktaṃ prajāyate 'tha tadīḍitamivānnamicamānaṃ carati tatpraivaitajjanayati tasmādiḍo yajati

He then pronounces the offering-prayer to the Ids. The Ids, doubtless, are offspring; when the seed thus cast springs into life, then it moves about in quest of food, as it were, praising (îd). Hence he thereby makes him (the sacrificer) propagate offspring: this is the reason why he, pronounces the prayer to the Ids.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.4

atha barhiryajati | bhūmā vai barhirbhūmānamevaitatprajanayati tasmādbarhiryajati

He then pronounces the offering-prayer to the Barhis. The barhis, doubtless, means abundance, hence he thereby produces an abundance: this is why he pronounces the prayer to the barhis.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.5

atha svāhāsvāheti yajati | hemanto vā ṛtūnāṃ svāhākāro hemanto hīmāḥ prajāḥ svaṃ vaśamupanayate tasmāddhemanmlāyantyoṣadhayaḥ pra vanaspatīnām palāśāni mucyante pratitirāmiva vayāṃsi bhavantyadhastarāmiva vayāṃsi patanti vipatitalomeva pāpaḥ puruṣo bhavati hemanto hīmāḥ prajāḥ svaṃ vaśamupanayate svāha vai tamardhaṃ kurute śriye 'nnādyāya yasminnardhe bhavati ya evametadveda

He then pronounces the offering-prayer with 'Svâhâ! Svâhâ!' The Svâhâ-call, indeed, is what the winter is among the seasons; for the winter subjects these creatures to its will: hence in winter the plants wither, and the leaves fall off the trees; the birds retire more and more, and fly lower and lower; and the wicked man has his hair, as it were, falling off; for the winter subjects these creatures to its will. And, verily, he who knows this, makes that locality wherein he lives, his own, for his own happiness and supply of food.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.6

devāśca vā asurāśca | ubhaye prājāpatyāḥ paspṛdhire te daṇḍairdhanurbhirna vyajayanta te hāvijayamānā ūcurhanta vācyeva brahmanvijigīṣāmahai sa yo no vācaṃ vyāhṛtām mithunena nānunikrāmātsa sarvam parājayātā atha sarvamitare jayāniti tatheti devā abruvaṃste devā indramabruvanvyāhareti

The gods and the Asuras, both of them sprung from Pragâpati, were once contending for superiority. With staves and bows neither party were able to overcome the other. Neither of them having gained the victory, they (the Asuras) said, 'Well then, let us try to overcome one another by speech, by sacred writ (brahman)! He who cannot follow up our uttered speech by (making up) a pair, shall be defeated and lose everything, and the other party shall win everything!' The gods replied, 'So be it!' The gods said to Indra, 'Speak thou!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.7

sa indro 'bravīt | eko mamatyathāsmākameketītare 'bruvaṃstadu tanmithunamevāvindanmithunaṃ hyekaścaikā ca

Indra said, 'One (eka, m., unus) for me!' The others then said, 'One (ekâ, f., una) for us!' and thus found that (desired) pair, for eka (unus) and ekâ (una) make a pair.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.8

dvau mametīndro 'bravīt | athāsmākaṃ dve itītare 'bruvaṃstadu tanmithunamevāvindanmithunaṃhi dvau ca dve ca

Indra said, 'Two (dvau, m., duo) for me!' The others then said, 'Two (dve, f., duae) for us!' and thus found that pair, for dvau (duo) and dve (duae) make a pair.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.9

trayo mametīndro 'bravīt | athāsmākaṃ tisra itītare 'bruvaṃstadu tanmithunamevāvindanmithunaṃ hi trayaśca tisraśca

Indra said, 'Three (trayah, m.) for me!' The others then said, 'Three (tisrah, f.) for us!' and thus found that pair, for trayah. and tisrah make a pair.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.10

catvāro mametīndro 'bravīt | athāsmākaṃ catasra itītare 'bruvaṃstadu tanmithunamevāvindanmithunaṃ hi catvāraśca catasraśca

Indra said, 'Four (katvârah, m.) for me!' The others then said, 'Four (katasrah, f.) for us!' and thus found that pair, for katvârah and katasrah make a pair.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.11

pañca mametīndro 'bravīt | tata itare mithunaṃ nāvindanno h yata ūrdhvaṃ mithunamasti pañca pañceti hyevaitadubhayam bhavati tato 'surāḥ sarvam parājayanta sarvasmāddevā asurānajayantsarvasmātsapatnānasurānnirabhajan

Indra said, 'Five (pañka, m. f., quinque) for me!' Then the others found no pair, for after that (numeral four) there is no pair, for then both (masculine and feminine) are pañka. Thereupon the Asuras were defeated and lost everything, and the gods won everything from the Asuras, and stripped their rivals, the Asuras, of everything.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.12

tasmātprathame prayāja iṣṭe brūyāt | eko mametyekā tasya yamahaṃ dveṣmīti yadyu na dviṣyādyo 'smāndveṣṭi yaṃ ca vayaṃ dviṣma iti brūyāt

For this reason let him (the sacrificer) say, when the first fore-offering has been performed, 'One (eka) for me!' and 'One (ekâ) for him whom we hate!' And if he should not hate any one, let him say, 'who hates us and whom we hate!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.13

dvau mameti dvitīye prayāje | dve tasya yo 'smāndveṣṭi yaṃ ca vayaṃ dviṣma iti

With the second fore-offering, 'Two (dvau) for me!' and 'Two (dve) for him who hates us and whom we hate!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.14

trayo mameti tṛtīye prayāje | tisrastasya yo 'smāndveṣṭi yaṃ ca vayaṃ dviṣma iti

With the third fore-offering, 'Three (trayah) for me!' and 'Three (tisrah) for him who hates us and whom we hate!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.15

catvāro mameti caturthe prayāje | catasrastasya yo 'smāndvesṭi yaṃca vayaṃ dviṣma iti

With the fourth fore-offering, 'Four (katvârah) for me!' and 'Four (katasrah) for him who hates us and whom we hate!'

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

1.5.4.16

pañca mameti pañcame prayāje | na tasya kiṃ cana yo 'smāndveṣṭi yaṃ ca vayaṃ dviṣma iti sa pañca pañcetyeva bhavanparābhavati tathāsya sarvaṃ saṃvṛṅkte sarvasmātsapatnānnirbhajati ya evametadveda

With the fifth fore-offering, 'Five (pañka) for me!' and 'Nothing for him who hates us and whom we hate!' For, there being 'five' to five,' he (the enemy) is defeated, and whoever knows this, appropriates to himself everything that belongs to that (enemy of his), strips his enemies of everything.

Julius Eggeling 1882, The Satapatha-Brahmana according to the Text of the Mâdhyandina School (SBE 12, 26, 41, 43, 44)

Translations (1)

Commentaries (1)

Linked texts (21)