俱舍論記 15.8

15.8

「從二得者至性罪遮罪」者，釋從二得。謂從二類得：一從情、非情類處得；二從發性罪、遮罪類處得。又解：言二類者，有兩種二類：一有情類、二非情類；一性罪類、二遮罪類。又解：言二類者，一有情類，能發性罪、遮罪；二非情類，能發性罪、遮罪。今受善戒，能離性罪及與遮罪故，從二類發性罪、遮罪處，還發得善戒。故《正理》三十九云「於情性罪謂殺等業，遮謂女人同室宿等。非情性罪謂盜外財，遮謂掘地斷生草等。」

"Arising from two […] offences intrinsically bad and offences by prohibition": this explains arising from two. That is to say, it arises from two classes: first, it arises from the locus of the class of sentient and non-sentient beings; second, it arises from the locus of the class of offences intrinsically bad (prakṛti-sāvadyam) and offences by prohibition (pratiṣedhanā-sāvadyam). Another explanation: stating that there are two classes means there are two kinds of two classes: (1) the class of sentient beings and (2) the class of non-sentient things; (1) the class of offences intrinsically bad and (2) the class of offences by prohibition. Yet another explanation: stating that there are two classes means: (1) the class of sentient beings can give rise to offences intrinsically bad and offences by prohibition; (2) the class of non-sentient things can give rise to offences intrinsically bad and offences by prohibition. Now, receiving the wholesome discipline can abandon offences intrinsically bad as well as offences by prohibition; therefore, from the locus of the two classes that give rise to offences intrinsically bad and offences by prohibition, the wholesome discipline is in turn generated and obtained. Thus the Nyāyānusāra, fascicle thirty-nine, states: "With respect to sentient beings, an offence intrinsically bad refers to actions such as killing; an offence by prohibition refers to such things as lodging in the same room with a woman. With respect to non-sentient things, an offence intrinsically bad refers to stealing external property; an offence by prohibition refers to such things as digging the earth and severing living grass."