瑜伽論記 5.223

5.223

基公解云：此有三重：一云，宗言所成立義名為所立，故此所立。而有義言：其宗能詮之言及因等言義皆名能立，其宗之言因喻成故雖亦所立。此下文說為先顯示自所愛樂宗義故亦所立非定所立，能成義故猶如於因喻能成故但名能立，所詮義決定唯是所立，獨名所成；二云，諸法總聚自性差別若教若理俱是所立，此俱名義隨應有故，總中一分對敵所申，若言若義自性差別俱名為宗則名能立，雖別宗亦是所立能立總故得能立名，故陳那等宗名所立，與瑜伽等理不相違，瑜伽等說宗非一向唯能立故；三云、自性差別合所依義名為所立，能依合宗說為能立，總立別故，非此總宗定唯能立，對敵合申因喻成故亦是所立，由非定所立故得能立名，陳那但以共許因喻成他未許，成他未許者唯是合宗，為所立，自性差別但是宗依，所望義殊不相違故。

Master Ji explains: There are three layers here: First, it is said that the meaning established by the words of the proposition is called that which is established; therefore this is that which is established. Yet some hold: The words of the proposition that express it, as well as the words and meanings of the reason and the rest, are all called that which establishes; although the words of the proposition are also that which is established because they are proved by the reason and example, as stated below, it is also that which is established and not definitively that which is established in order first to display the meaning of the proposition that one cherishes; because it can establish the meaning, just like the reason and example, it is merely called that which establishes; the expressed meaning is definitively that which is established alone, and is solely called that which is established. Second, it is said that the totality of intrinsic nature and distinction across all dharmas, whether scriptural or rational, is that which is established; these are all called meanings as appropriate; a part of the totality presented against the opponent, whether in word or meaning, intrinsic nature or distinction, is collectively called the proposition, and is thus called that which establishes; although the distinct proposition is also that which is established, because it is the totality of that which establishes, it receives the name of that which establishes; therefore, Dignāga and others naming the proposition as that which is established does not contradict the principle in the Yogācārabhūmi and other texts, because the Yogācārabhūmi and other texts state that the proposition is not exclusively that which establishes. Third, it is said that the meaning of the basis in which intrinsic nature and distinction combine is called that which is established; the combined proposition that is supported is said to be that which establishes, because the totality establishes the distinct; this combined proposition is not definitively that which establishes alone; because it is jointly presented against the opponent and proved by the reason and example, it is also that which is established; because it is not definitively that which is established, it gets the name of that which establishes; Dignāga merely uses commonly accepted reasons and examples to prove what the other has not yet accepted; that which proves what the other has not accepted is solely the combined proposition, which serves as that which is established; intrinsic nature and distinction are merely the bases of the proposition; since the intended meanings differ, there is no contradiction.