Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Kathavatthu 2.7: Cittaṭṭhitikathā

Kathāvatthu 2.7

Language
Pāli

Contents

Cittaṭṭhitikathā

2.7.1.1

Ekaṃ cittaṃ divasaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

Does a single consciousness persist for a day?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Controverted Point: That a single unit of consciousness lasts for a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.1.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Controverted Point: That a single unit of consciousness lasts for a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.1.3

Upaḍḍhadivaso uppādakkhaṇo, upaḍḍhadivaso vayakkhaṇoti?

Is half a day the moment of arising, and half a day the moment of cessation?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: If your proposition is true, does one-half of the day belong to the “nascent moment”, and one-half to the “cessant moment”? You say no; but you have implied it. A similar admission is involved in affirming that a state of consciousness lasts two days, or four days or eight, ten, or twenty days, or a month, or two, four, eight, or ten months, or a year, or any number of years, or any number of æon ons.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.1.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe.

It should not be said thus.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.2.1

Ekaṃ cittaṃ dve divase tiṭṭhatīti?

Does a single consciousness persist for two days?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.2.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.2.3

Divaso uppādakkhaṇo, divaso vayakkhaṇoti?

Is one day the moment of arising, and one day the moment of cessation?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.2.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe.

It should not be said thus.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.1

Ekaṃ cittaṃ cattāro divase tiṭṭhati …

Does a single consciousness persist for four days …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.2

aṭṭha divase tiṭṭhati …

persist for eight days …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.3

dasa divase tiṭṭhati …

persist for ten days …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.4

vīsati divase tiṭṭhati …

persist for twenty days …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.5

māsaṃ tiṭṭhati …

persist for a month …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.6

dve māse tiṭṭhati …

persist for two months …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.7

cattāro māse tiṭṭhati …

persist for four months …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.8

aṭṭha māse tiṭṭhati …

persist for eight months …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.9

dasa māse tiṭṭhati …

persist for ten months …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.10

saṃvaccharaṃ tiṭṭhati …

persist for a year …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.11

dve vassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for two years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.12

cattāri vassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for four years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.13

aṭṭha vassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for eight years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.14

dasa vassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for ten years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.15

vīsati vassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for twenty years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.16

tiṃsa vassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for thirty years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.17

cattārīsa vassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for forty years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.18

paññāsa vassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for fifty years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.19

vassasataṃ tiṭṭhati …

persist for a hundred years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.20

dve vassasatāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for two hundred years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.21

cattāri vassasatāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for four hundred years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.22

pañca vassasatāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for five hundred years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.23

vassasahassaṃ tiṭṭhati …

persist for a thousand years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.24

dve vassasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for two thousand years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.25

cattāri vassasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for four thousand years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.26

aṭṭha vassasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for eight thousand years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.27

soḷasa vassasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for sixteen thousand years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.28

kappaṃ tiṭṭhati …

persist for an eon …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.29

dve kappe tiṭṭhati …

persist for two eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.30

cattāro kappe tiṭṭhati …

persist for four eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.31

aṭṭha kappe tiṭṭhati …

persist for eight eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.32

soḷasa kappe tiṭṭhati …

persist for sixteen eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.33

bāttiṃsa kappe tiṭṭhati …

persist for thirty-two eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.34

catusaṭṭhi kappe tiṭṭhati …

persist for sixty-four eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.35

pañca kappasatāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for five hundred eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.36

kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for a thousand eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.37

dve kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for two thousand eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.38

cattāri kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for four thousand eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.39

aṭṭha kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for eight thousand eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.40

soḷasa kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for sixteen thousand eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.41

vīsati kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for twenty thousand eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.42

cattārīsa kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for forty thousand eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.43

saṭṭhi kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persist for sixty thousand eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.44

caturāsīti kappasahassāni tiṭṭhatīti?

persist for eighty-four thousand eons?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.45

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.46

Dvecattārīsa kappasahassāni uppādakkhaṇo, dvecattārīsa kappasahassāni vayakkhaṇoti?

Are forty-two thousand eons the moment of arising, and forty-two thousand eons the moment of cessation?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.3.47

Na hevaṃ vattabbe.

It should not be said thus.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.4.1

Ekaṃ cittaṃ divasaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

Does a single mind endure for a day?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Are there other phenomena beside mind which arise and cease many times during one day? Yes, you say? Then do you contend that they come and go as quickly as mind? If you say no, then your proposition falls. If you say they do, was it not said by the Exalted One:

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.4.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.4.3

Atthaññe dhammā ekāhaṃ bahumpi uppajjitvā nirujjhantīti?

Are there other phenomena that arise and cease many times in one day?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.4.4

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.4.5

Te dhammā cittena lahuparivattāti?

Do those phenomena change more quickly than mind?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.4.6

Na hevaṃ vattabbe.

It should not be said thus.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.5.1

Te dhammā cittena lahuparivattāti?

Do those phenomena change more quickly than mind?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.5.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.5.3

Nanu vuttaṃ bhagavatā—

Was it not said by the Blessed One:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“I consider, bhikkhus, that there is no phenomenon that comes and goes so quickly as mind. It is not easy to find a simile to show how quickly mind comes and goes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.5.4

“nāhaṃ, bhikkhave, aññaṃ ekadhammampi samanupassāmi evaṃ lahuparivattaṃ yathayidaṃ cittaṃ.

“Monks, I do not see any single phenomenon that changes so quickly as this mind.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“I consider, bhikkhus, that there is no phenomenon that comes and goes so quickly as mind. It is not easy to find a simile to show how quickly mind comes and goes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.5.5

Yāvañcidaṃ, bhikkhave, upamāpi na sukarā yāva lahuparivattaṃ cittan”ti.

To such an extent, monks, that even a simile is not easy [to make] for how quickly the mind changes”?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“I consider, bhikkhus, that there is no phenomenon that comes and goes so quickly as mind. It is not easy to find a simile to show how quickly mind comes and goes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.5.6

Attheva suttantoti?

Is there such a discourse?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“I consider, bhikkhus, that there is no phenomenon that comes and goes so quickly as mind. It is not easy to find a simile to show how quickly mind comes and goes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.5.7

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“I consider, bhikkhus, that there is no phenomenon that comes and goes so quickly as mind. It is not easy to find a simile to show how quickly mind comes and goes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.5.8

Tena hi na vattabbaṃ—

Then it should not be said:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“I consider, bhikkhus, that there is no phenomenon that comes and goes so quickly as mind. It is not easy to find a simile to show how quickly mind comes and goes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.5.9

“te dhammā cittena lahuparivattā”ti.

“Those phenomena change more quickly than mind.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“I consider, bhikkhus, that there is no phenomenon that comes and goes so quickly as mind. It is not easy to find a simile to show how quickly mind comes and goes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.6.1

Te dhammā cittena lahuparivattāti?

Do those phenomena change more quickly than mind?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Again:

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.6.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Again:

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.6.3

Nanu vuttaṃ bhagavatā—

Was it not said by the Blessed One:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Again:

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.6.4

“seyyathāpi, bhikkhave, makkaṭo araññe pavane caramāno sākhaṃ gaṇhati, taṃ muñcitvā aññaṃ gaṇhati, taṃ muñcitvā aññaṃ gaṇhati;

“Just as, monks, a monkey moving about in a dense forest takes hold of a branch, releases it and takes hold of another, releases that and takes hold of another;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Just as a monkey faring through the dense forest catches one bough, and, letting it go, catches another, and then another, even so, bhikkhus, with what is called thought, or mind, or consciousness, by day as by night, one arises when another perishes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.6.5

evameva kho, bhikkhave, yamidaṃ vuccati cittaṃ itipi mano itipi viññāṇaṃ itipi taṃ rattiyā ca divasassa ca aññadeva uppajjati aññaṃ nirujjhatī”ti.

just so, monks, that which is called ‘mind,’ or ‘mental organ,’ or ‘consciousness,’ arises as one and ceases as another throughout the night and the day”?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Just as a monkey faring through the dense forest catches one bough, and, letting it go, catches another, and then another, even so, bhikkhus, with what is called thought, or mind, or consciousness, by day as by night, one arises when another perishes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.6.6

Attheva suttantoti?

Is there such a discourse?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Just as a monkey faring through the dense forest catches one bough, and, letting it go, catches another, and then another, even so, bhikkhus, with what is called thought, or mind, or consciousness, by day as by night, one arises when another perishes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.6.7

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Just as a monkey faring through the dense forest catches one bough, and, letting it go, catches another, and then another, even so, bhikkhus, with what is called thought, or mind, or consciousness, by day as by night, one arises when another perishes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.6.8

Tena hi na vattabbaṃ—

Then it should not be said:

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Just as a monkey faring through the dense forest catches one bough, and, letting it go, catches another, and then another, even so, bhikkhus, with what is called thought, or mind, or consciousness, by day as by night, one arises when another perishes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.6.9

“te dhammā cittena lahuparivattā”ti.

“Those phenomena change more quickly than mind.”

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

“Just as a monkey faring through the dense forest catches one bough, and, letting it go, catches another, and then another, even so, bhikkhus, with what is called thought, or mind, or consciousness, by day as by night, one arises when another perishes”?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.1

Ekaṃ cittaṃ divasaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

Does a single mind endure for a day?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.3

Cakkhuviññāṇaṃ divasaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

Does eye-consciousness endure for a day?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe.

It should not be said thus.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.5

Sotaviññāṇaṃ …pe…

Does ear-consciousness … [and so on] …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.6

ghānaviññāṇaṃ …

nose-consciousness …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.7

jivhāviññāṇaṃ …

tongue-consciousness …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.8

kāyaviññāṇaṃ …

body-consciousness …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.9

akusalaṃ cittaṃ …

unwholesome mind …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.10

rāgasahagataṃ …

accompanied by lust …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.11

dosasahagataṃ …

accompanied by hatred …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.12

mohasahagataṃ …

accompanied by delusion …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.13

mānasahagataṃ …

accompanied by conceit …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.14

diṭṭhisahagataṃ …

accompanied by wrong view …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.15

vicikicchāsahagataṃ …

accompanied by doubt …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.16

thinasahagataṃ …

accompanied by sloth …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.17

uddhaccasahagataṃ …

accompanied by restlessness …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.18

ahirikasahagataṃ …

accompanied by shamelessness …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.19

anottappasahagataṃ cittaṃ divasaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

does a mind accompanied by fearlessness of wrongdoing endure for a day?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.7.20

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

It should not be said thus … [and so on] ….

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Take the content of a state of consciousness: does any visual consciousness or other sense-consciousness last a whole day, or any bad thought, such as consciousness accompanied by passion, hate, ignorance, conceit, error, doubt, sloth, distraction, impudence, or indiscretion? If not, then neither can consciousness be said to last a day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.1

Ekaṃ cittaṃ divasaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

Does a single mind endure for a day?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.3

Yeneva cittena cakkhunā rūpaṃ passati, teneva cittena sotena saddaṃ suṇāti …pe…

With the very mind by which one sees a material form with the eye, does one with that same mind hear a sound with the ear … [and so on] …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.4

ghānena gandhaṃ ghāyati …

smell an odor with the nose …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.5

jivhāya rasaṃ sāyati …

taste a flavor with the tongue …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.6

kāyena phoṭṭhabbaṃ phusati …

touch a tangible object with the body …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.7

manasā dhammaṃ vijānāti …pe…

cognize a mental phenomenon with the mind … [and so on] …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.8

yeneva cittena manasā dhammaṃ vijānāti, teneva cittena cakkhunā rūpaṃ passati …pe…

with the very mind by which one cognizes a mental phenomenon with the mind, does one with that same mind see a material form with the eye … [and so on] …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.9

sotena saddaṃ suṇāti …

hear a sound with the ear …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.10

ghānena gandhaṃ ghāyati …

smell an odor with the nose …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.11

jivhāya rasaṃ sāyati …pe…

taste a flavor with the tongue … [and so on] …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.12

kāyena phoṭṭhabbaṃ phusatīti?

touch a tangible object with the body?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.8.13

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

It should not be said thus … [and so on] ….

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Does one hear, smell, taste, touch, apprehend mentally by means of the same unit of consciousness as one sees? Or see, hear, etc., or touch by means of the same unit of consciousness as one apprehends mentally? You say “no”. Then you cannot affirm that one and the same unit of consciousness lasts a whole day.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.9.1

Ekaṃ cittaṃ divasaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

Does a single mind endure for a day?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Similarly, if you deny that one moves backward with the same unit of consciousness as one moves forward, and vice versa, you cannot affirm your proposition. A similar argument applies to looking backward, looking forward, and to bending, extending by means of the same unit of consciousness.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.9.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Similarly, if you deny that one moves backward with the same unit of consciousness as one moves forward, and vice versa, you cannot affirm your proposition. A similar argument applies to looking backward, looking forward, and to bending, extending by means of the same unit of consciousness.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.9.3

Yeneva cittena abhikkamati, teneva cittena paṭikkamati;

Does one step forward with the very same mind with which one steps back;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Similarly, if you deny that one moves backward with the same unit of consciousness as one moves forward, and vice versa, you cannot affirm your proposition. A similar argument applies to looking backward, looking forward, and to bending, extending by means of the same unit of consciousness.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.9.4

yeneva cittena paṭikkamati, teneva cittena abhikkamati;

does one step back with the very same mind with which one steps forward;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Similarly, if you deny that one moves backward with the same unit of consciousness as one moves forward, and vice versa, you cannot affirm your proposition. A similar argument applies to looking backward, looking forward, and to bending, extending by means of the same unit of consciousness.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.9.5

yeneva cittena āloketi, teneva cittena viloketi;

does one look ahead with the very same mind with which one looks aside;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Similarly, if you deny that one moves backward with the same unit of consciousness as one moves forward, and vice versa, you cannot affirm your proposition. A similar argument applies to looking backward, looking forward, and to bending, extending by means of the same unit of consciousness.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.9.6

yeneva cittena viloketi, teneva cittena āloketi;

does one look aside with the very same mind with which one looks ahead;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Similarly, if you deny that one moves backward with the same unit of consciousness as one moves forward, and vice versa, you cannot affirm your proposition. A similar argument applies to looking backward, looking forward, and to bending, extending by means of the same unit of consciousness.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.9.7

yeneva cittena samiñjeti, teneva cittena pasāreti;

does one bend [a limb] with the very same mind with which one stretches it out;

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Similarly, if you deny that one moves backward with the same unit of consciousness as one moves forward, and vice versa, you cannot affirm your proposition. A similar argument applies to looking backward, looking forward, and to bending, extending by means of the same unit of consciousness.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.9.8

yeneva cittena pasāreti, teneva cittena samiñjetīti?

does one stretch [it] out with the very same mind with which one bends it?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Similarly, if you deny that one moves backward with the same unit of consciousness as one moves forward, and vice versa, you cannot affirm your proposition. A similar argument applies to looking backward, looking forward, and to bending, extending by means of the same unit of consciousness.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.9.9

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

It should not be said thus …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Similarly, if you deny that one moves backward with the same unit of consciousness as one moves forward, and vice versa, you cannot affirm your proposition. A similar argument applies to looking backward, looking forward, and to bending, extending by means of the same unit of consciousness.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.10.1

Ākāsānañcāyatanūpagānaṃ devānaṃ ekaṃ cittaṃ yāvatāyukaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

Does a single mind of the gods who have attained the sphere of infinite space last for the whole duration of their life?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

In the case of the devas who have reached the realm of space-infinity, does any unit of consciousness last their whole lifetime? You affirm it does, yet you deny a similar duration in the case of humanity. You deny it also in the case of all devas of the plane of sense-desires, and of all devas of the higher or Rūpa plane, why not of those of the first-named non-Rūpa plane?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.10.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.10.3

Manussānaṃ ekaṃ cittaṃ yāvatāyukaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

Does a single mind of human beings last for the whole duration of their life?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.10.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe.

It should not be said thus.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.1

Ākāsānañcāyatanūpagānaṃ devānaṃ ekaṃ cittaṃ yāvatāyukaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

Does a single mind of the gods who have attained the sphere of infinite space last for the whole duration of their life?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.3

Cātumahārājikānaṃ devānaṃ …pe…

Of the gods of the Four Great Kings …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.4

tāvatiṃsānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the Tāvatiṃsa gods …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.5

yāmānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the Yāma gods …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.6

tusitānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the Tusita gods …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.7

nimmānaratīnaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods who delight in creation …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.8

paranimmitavasavattīnaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods who exercise control over the creations of others …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.9

brahmapārisajjānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods of Brahmā's retinue …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.10

brahmapurohitānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods of Brahmā's ministers …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.11

mahābrahmānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods of the Great Brahmās …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.12

parittābhānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods of limited radiance …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.13

appamāṇābhānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods of immeasurable radiance …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.14

ābhassarānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods of streaming radiance …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.15

parittasubhānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods of limited beauty …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.16

appamāṇasubhānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods of immeasurable beauty …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.17

subhakiṇhānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods of refulgent beauty …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.18

vehapphalānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the gods of abundant fruit …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.19

avihānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the Aviha gods …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.20

atappānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the Atappa gods …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.21

sudassānaṃ devānaṃ …

of the Sudassa gods …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.22

sudassīnaṃ devānaṃ …

of the Sudassī gods …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.23

akaniṭṭhānaṃ devānaṃ ekaṃ cittaṃ yāvatāyukaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

does a single mind of the Akaniṭṭha gods last for the whole duration of their life?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.11.24

Na hevaṃ vattabbe.

It should not be said thus.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.12.1

Ākāsānañcāyatanūpagānaṃ devānaṃ vīsati kappasahassāni āyuppamāṇaṃ, ākāsānañcāyatanūpagānaṃ devānaṃ ekaṃ cittaṃ vīsati kappasahassāni tiṭṭhatīti?

The life span of the gods who have attained the sphere of infinite space is twenty thousand eons; does a single mind of the gods who have attained the sphere of infinite space last for twenty thousand eons?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

You affirm, I say, this duration of a unit of consciousness during the 20,000 æon ons of the Arūpa-deva's life, yet you deny an analogous duration in a unit of human consciousness, lasting, say, for 100 years, and you deny it in the case of all those devas of the Kāmaloka and Rūpaloka, whose lifetime varies from 500 years in the Four Great Kings to 16,000 æon ons of years in the senior devas.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.12.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.12.3

Manussānaṃ vassasataṃ āyuppamāṇaṃ, manussānaṃ ekaṃ cittaṃ vassasataṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

The life span of human beings is a hundred years; does a single mind of human beings last for a hundred years?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.12.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe.

It should not be said thus.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.1

Ākāsānañcāyatanūpagānaṃ devānaṃ vīsati kappasahassāni āyuppamāṇaṃ, ākāsānañcāyatanūpagānaṃ devānaṃ ekaṃ cittaṃ vīsati kappasahassāni tiṭṭhatīti?

The life span of the gods who have attained the sphere of infinite space is twenty thousand eons; does a single mind of the gods who have attained the sphere of infinite space last for twenty thousand eons?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.3

Cātumahārājikānaṃ devānaṃ pañca vassasatāni āyuppamāṇaṃ, cātumahārājikānaṃ devānaṃ ekaṃ cittaṃ pañca vassasatāni tiṭṭhati …

The life span of the gods of the Four Great Kings is five hundred years; does a single mind of the gods of the Four Great Kings last for five hundred years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.4

vassasahassaṃ tiṭṭhati …

does it last for a thousand years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.5

dve vassasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

does it last for two thousand years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.6

cattāri vassasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

does it last for four thousand years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.7

aṭṭha vassasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

does it last for eight thousand years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.8

soḷasa vassasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

does it last for sixteen thousand years …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.9

kappassa tatiyabhāgaṃ tiṭṭhati …

does it last for a third of an eon …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.10

upaḍḍhakappaṃ tiṭṭhati …

does it last for half an eon …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.11

ekaṃ kappaṃ tiṭṭhati …

does it last for one eon …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.12

dve kappe tiṭṭhati …

does it last for two eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.13

cattāro kappe tiṭṭhati …

does it last for four eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.14

aṭṭha kappe tiṭṭhati …

does it last for eight eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.15

soḷasa kappe tiṭṭhati …

does it last for sixteen eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.16

bāttiṃsa kappe tiṭṭhati …

does it last for thirty-two eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.17

catusaṭṭhi kappe tiṭṭhati …

does it last for sixty-four eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.18

pañca kappasatāni tiṭṭhati …

does it last for five hundred eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.19

kappasahassaṃ tiṭṭhati …

does it last for a thousand eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.20

dve kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

does it last for two thousand eons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.21

cattāri kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

Does it endure for four thousand aeons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.22

aṭṭha kappasahassāni tiṭṭhati …

persists for eight thousand aeons …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.23

akaniṭṭhānaṃ devānaṃ soḷasa kappasahassāni āyuppamāṇaṃ, akaniṭṭhānaṃ devānaṃ ekaṃ cittaṃ soḷasa kappasahassāni tiṭṭhatīti?

If the lifespan of the gods of the Akaniṭṭha realm is sixteen thousand aeons, does a single mind of the gods of the Akaniṭṭha realm persist for sixteen thousand aeons?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.13.24

Na hevaṃ vattabbe.

It should not be said thus.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

2.7.14.1

Ākāsānañcāyatanūpagānaṃ devānaṃ cittaṃ muhuttaṃ muhuttaṃ uppajjati muhuttaṃ muhuttaṃ nirujjhatīti?

Does the mind of the gods who have attained the sphere of infinite space arise moment by moment and cease moment by moment?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Andhaka: Does then the mind of the devas who have reached the plane of space-infinity arise and cease moment by moment?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.14.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: It does.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.14.3

Ākāsānañcāyatanūpagā devā muhuttaṃ muhuttaṃ cavanti muhuttaṃ muhuttaṃ uppajjantīti?

Do the gods who have attained the sphere of infinite space pass away moment by moment and arise moment by moment?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Andhaka: But do these devas themselves decease, and are they reborn moment by moment?

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.14.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe.

It should not be said thus.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: Nay, that cannot truly be said.

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.15.1

Ākāsānañcāyatanūpagānaṃ devānaṃ ekaṃ cittaṃ yāvatāyukaṃ tiṭṭhatīti?

Does a single mind of the gods who have attained the sphere of infinite space persist for the length of their lifespan?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: But if you affirm that in the case of these devas a unit of consciousness lasts as long as they live, then you must also admit that they die with the same unit of consciousness as that wherewith they are reborn; but you are not prepared to admit this … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.15.2

Āmantā.

Yes.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: But if you affirm that in the case of these devas a unit of consciousness lasts as long as they live, then you must also admit that they die with the same unit of consciousness as that wherewith they are reborn; but you are not prepared to admit this … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.15.3

Ākāsānañcāyatanūpagā devā yeneva cittena uppajjanti, teneva cittena cavantīti?

Do the gods who have attained the sphere of infinite space pass away with the very same mind with which they arise?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: But if you affirm that in the case of these devas a unit of consciousness lasts as long as they live, then you must also admit that they die with the same unit of consciousness as that wherewith they are reborn; but you are not prepared to admit this … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.15.4

Na hevaṃ vattabbe …pe….

It should not be said thus … and so forth …

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Theravādin: But if you affirm that in the case of these devas a unit of consciousness lasts as long as they live, then you must also admit that they die with the same unit of consciousness as that wherewith they are reborn; but you are not prepared to admit this … .

Shwe Zan Aung & Caroline A. F. Rhys Davids 1915, Points of Controversy, or Subjects of Discourse

2.7.15.5

Cittaṭṭhitikathā niṭṭhitā.

Discussion on the duration of consciousness is finished.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (2)

Commentaries (2)

Linked texts (3)